SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK
Document date 10 October 1975
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-36:318-318
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-36:318-318 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-36:318-318 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-36%3A318-318 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 36 p. 318 (DB Cooper-13876), Airtel, dated 10 Oct 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-36%3A318-318
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI Date: 10/10/75
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
RE: [REDACTED]
---
On 10/9/75, [REDACTED] Gladstone Police Department, Gladstone, Oregon, advised that an informant, known [REDACTED] as a reliable person, suggested to him as a suspect in this matter one [REDACTED] is reportedly a white male, age 40's, 6', 160 - 170 pounds, medium build, black hair, medium cut; dark, [REDACTED] complexion; resident of [REDACTED] Washington; former [REDACTED] currently employed as [REDACTED] Washington.
[REDACTED] advised his informant suspects [REDACTED] because of his [REDACTED] the fact that he bears a close resemblance to the composite sketch of unsub, and his familiarity with, and residence in, [REDACTED] Washington.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE
AT [REDACTED] COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Will conduct logical investigation to involve or eliminate [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in this matter.
---
(2)-Seattle 2-Portland
RPH:krv (4)
[Signature]
Approved: ________ Sent ________ M Per ________ DB Cooper-13876 Special Agent in Charge U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
---
[stamped date, partially legible] -6703 [illegible] [guess: Oct] OCT 15 1975
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.