SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, referencing Seattle communication 2/27/76

Document date 6 April 1976

Part 9page 4831 pageDB Cooper-1207

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 483 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:483-483

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:483-483

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, referencing Seattle communication 2/27/76
Id: Cooper-Part-09:483-483
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A483-483

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 483 (DB Cooper-1207), Airtel, dated 6 Apr 1976, serial PD 164-41-1522 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A483-483

4/6/76

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41)(P) SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)

---

RE [REDACTED - b6/b7C]

Re Seattle letter to Portland, 2/27/76.

Enclosed for Seattle are two copies each of three inserts setting forth investigation at [REDACTED - b6/b7C] Oregon.

---

In view of the fact individuals [REDACTED - b6/b7C] note his description is not in accordance with the des- cription D. B. COOPER and the fact [REDACTED - b6/b7C] had two readily identifiable [REDACTED - b6/b7C] is not believed to be identical to COOPER, and further investigation in this matter is not warranted.

---

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

3- Seattle (Enc. 6) 2- Portland

RFR:laa (5) [signature]

---

[REDACTED - b6/b7C] [signature box redacted]

Searched 164-41-1522 [or similar] Serialized [signature] Indexed [signature] Filed

DB Cooper-1207

Serials: PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1522, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.