Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Portland re NORJAK latent comparison

Document date 4 November 1976

Part 10page 681 pageDB Cooper-1284

Open in FBI Vault (Part 10, page 68 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-10:068-068

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-10:068-068

Document: Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Portland re NORJAK latent comparison
Id: Cooper-Part-10:068-068
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A068-068

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 p. 68 (DB Cooper-1284), Report, dated 4 Nov 1976, serial PD 164-41-1568 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A068-068

1-336 (Rev. 6-17-76)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION

YOUR FILE NO. 164-41 November 4, 1976 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410

TO: SAC, Portland

RE: NORJAK

REFERENCE: Airtel 10/19/76 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Portland SPECIMENS:

---

The latent impressions previously reported in this case are not identical with available fingerprints of [REDACTED] born [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]

Since some of the latent prints previously reported are sides and tips of fingers and palm prints, major case prints are necessary for conclusive comparisons.

A search conducted through our name indices does not disclose any criminal identification record for [REDACTED]

---

2 - Seattle (164-81)

Richard S. Cook Assistant Director, Identification Division

THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DB Cooper-1284

164-41-1568 FBI/DOJ

Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1568, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.