Identification Division latent fingerprint report to SAC Portland re NORJAK comparison

Document date 4 November 1976

Part 38page 3031 pageDB Cooper-14978

Open in FBI Vault (Part 38, page 303 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-38:303-303

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:303-303

Document: Identification Division latent fingerprint report to SAC Portland re NORJAK comparison
Id: Cooper-Part-38:303-303
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A303-303

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 p. 303 (DB Cooper-14978), Form, dated 4 Nov 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A303-303

1-333 (Rev. 6-17-76) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION

YOUR FILE NO. 164-41 November 4, 1976 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. [redacted]

TO: SAC, Portland

RE: NORJAK

---

REFERENCE: Airtel 10/19/76 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Portland SPECIMENS:

The latent impressions previously reported in this case are not identical with available fingerprints of [redacted] [redacted] born [redacted] U. S. Air Force service number [redacted] and U. S. Civil Service Commission number [redacted]

Since some of the latent prints previously reported are sides and tips of fingers and palm prints, major case prints are necessary for conclusive comparisons.

A search conducted through our name indices does not disclose any criminal identification record for [redacted]

---

(2) - Seattle (164-81)

[handwritten: 11, d - P1 - 7/65]

Assistant Director, Identification Division FBI -- SEATTLE

THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DB Cooper-14978

Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.