SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re suspect cleared by payroll records

This copy: Part 100 p. 287Also filed at Part 56 p. 87 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, Pacific Telephone employee

Document date 27 January 1972

Part 100page 2871 pageDB Cooper-45245

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 56 p. 87.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 100, page 287 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-100:287-287

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-100:287-287

Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect, Pacific Telephone employee
Id: Cooper-Part-100:287-287
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-100%3A287-287

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 100 p. 287 (DB Cooper-45245), Airtel, dated 27 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-100%3A287-287

1/27/72

AIRTEL AIR MAIL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P) RE: NORJAK

---

Re Sacramento teletype to Seattle and Los Angeles dated 1/10/72.

RE: SUSPECT [REDACTED]

On 1/26/72, [REDACTED], Pacific Telephone Company, Orange County, California, advised SA [REDACTED] that payroll records of this firm indicate [REDACTED] was at work in Orange County, California, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., on 11/24/71.

In view of the above, it does not appear [REDACTED] warrants additional investigation as a logical suspect at this time.

UNSUB SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

2 - Seattle (AM) 2 - Los Angeles

crs/kah (4)

[REDACTED] 164-81-[illegible] SEARCHED... INDEXED SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] JAN 31 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

DB COOPER-45245

Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.