SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle eliminating suspect via employer payroll records

Document date 27 January 1972

Part 21page 241 pageDB Cooper-6275

Open in FBI Vault (Part 21, page 24 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-21:024-024

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-21:024-024

Document: Airtel SAC Los Angeles to SAC Seattle eliminating suspect via employer payroll records
Id: Cooper-Part-21:024-024
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-21%3A024-024

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 21 p. 24 (DB Cooper-6275), Airtel, dated 27 Jan 1972, serial SE 164-81-2117 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-21%3A024-024

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 1/27/72

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, LOS ANGELES (164-497) (P)

RE: NORJAK

E l i m

Re Sacramento teletype to Seattle and Los Angeles dated 1/10/72.

RE: SUSPECT [REDACTED]

On 1/26/72, [REDACTED] Pacific Telephone Company, Orange County, California, advised SA[REDACTED] that payroll records of this firm indicate[REDACTED] was at work in Orange County, California, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., on 11/24/71.

In view of the above, it does not appear [REDACTED] warrants additional investigation as a logical suspect at this time.

UNSUB SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

2 - Seattle (AM) 2 - Los Angeles

crs/kah (4)

---

164-81 -2117 SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ JAN 31 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge

Sent _________ M Per _________

* U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1969 O - DB Cooper-6275

Serials: LA 164-497, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2117

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.