SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Stardust Hotel employment and missing person canvass
Document date 3 February 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-102:363-365
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-102:363-365 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Stardust Hotel employment and missing person canvass Id: Cooper-Part-102:363-365 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A363-365 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 102 pp. 363–365 (DB Cooper-46363–46365), Airtel, dated 3 Feb 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A363-365
2/3/72
---
AIRTEL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)(P) RE: NORJAK
Re Butel 12/28/71 and Sacramento airtel 1/11/72.
Enclosed for Sacramento and Seattle is one copy each of photographs of [REDACTED] taken in the 1960's at Las Vegas.
A canvas has been made of law enforcement agencies in the Las Vegas Division for reported missing persons in accordance with directions in re Butel with negative results.
[REDACTED]
Stardust Hotel, advised on 1/17/72, that records of personnel and employees during the early 1960's are currently in storage and it would take approximately two weeks to make a pertinent appropriate file review for a former [REDACTED].
[REDACTED], Stardust Hotel, who has held that position [REDACTED] advised on 1/17/72, that he had no personal recollection of a former [REDACTED].
[REDACTED] was recontacted 2/1/72, and advised that a thorough search of their records failed to disclose the former [REDACTED] ever having been employed at that establishment.
@ - Seattle (Enc. 2) 2 - Sacramento (164-50)(Enc. 2) 1 - Las Vegas
---
HEH:bsh (5)
---
164-81-[illegible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED /FILED _____ FEB (2) 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
DB COOPER-46363
---
b6 b7C
LV 164-60
---
She noted, however, that their records did disclose one, [REDACTED], born [REDACTED], with Social Security Number [REDACTED] and residence [REDACTED], [REDACTED], Nevada, was employed as a [REDACTED] at the Stardust Hotel from [REDACTED], when he voluntarily resigned. She stated there was nothing additional concerning [REDACTED] in their personnel files, and noted that employment records for that period were maintained by a security firm known as [REDACTED], which is no longer in operation.
---
Lt. [REDACTED], Records Division, Clark County SO, advised on 2/1/72, that they had no record of [REDACTED] and that any [REDACTED] would require a work permit from the Clark County SO.
---
Their records disclosed # [REDACTED] which indicated that [REDACTED] a W/M adult, born [REDACTED], at [REDACTED], 61" tall, 183 pounds, medium build, black hair, blue-gray eyes, dark complexion, with [REDACTED] and residence at [REDACTED], Nevada, subject [REDACTED], who had been an Air Force veteran with honorable discharge as a private first class serial # [REDACTED] held a work permit for employment as a [REDACTED] Nevada.
---
According to their records [REDACTED] was initially employed with the Tropicana Hotel as of [REDACTED], the Riviera Hotel [REDACTED], the Dunes Hotel on [REDACTED], the Silver Slipper on [REDACTED], and the Stardust Hotel from [REDACTED] when his card was cancelled due to his resignation from the Stardust.
---
[REDACTED] file indicated a prior arrest by the [REDACTED] and at the time of his work card application on 1/15/62, for the Stardust Hotel he listed the following references:
[REDACTED]
---
DB COOPER-46364
---
b6 b7C
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] Records Division, Las Vegas PD advised on 2/1/72; their file [REDACTED] disclosed that [REDACTED] [REDACTED], born [REDACTED], with residence at [REDACTED], Nevada, had made application for [REDACTED] position with the Las Vegas PD on 4/22/57, received a work card [REDACTED] the Mint Hotel on 2/20/59, and was [REDACTED] 9/18/61, [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
The record disclosed that [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
LEADS:
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
At South Lake Tahoe, California:
Display enclosed photographs to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to determine if [REDACTED] is identical to the [REDACTED] he described as [REDACTED] at the Stardust in Las Vegas in 1963.
2. If identical Sacramento will then contact DMV, obtain most recent photograph of [REDACTED] and have same forwarded to Seattle and related offices for display to pertinent witness in this matter for identification or elimination as subject.
CONSIDER UNSUB DANGEROUS.
---
DB COOPER-46365
---
2
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: LV 164-60, SC 164-50, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.