SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Stardust Hotel employment records and photographs
Document date 3 February 1972
Also filed at: Part 75 pp. 26–28
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-22:030-032
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-22:030-032 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Stardust Hotel employment records and photographs Id: Cooper-Part-22:030-032 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A030-032 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 22 pp. 30–32 (DB Cooper-6371–6373), Airtel, dated 3 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-2174 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A030-032
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 2/3/72
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)(P)
RE: NORJAK
Re Butel 12/28/71 and Sacramento airtel 1/11/72.
Enclosed for Sacramento and Seattle is one copy each of photographs of [REDACTED] taken in the 1960's at Las Vegas.
A canvas has been made of law enforcement agencies in the Las Vegas Division for reported missing persons in accordance with directions in re Butel with negative results.
[REDACTED] Stardust Hotel, advised on 1/17/72, that records of personnel and employees during the early 1960's are currently in storage and it would take approximately two weeks to make a pertinent appropriate file review for a former [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Stardust Hotel, who has held that position [REDACTED] advised on 1/11//2, that he had no personal recollection of a former [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] was recontacted 2/1/72, and advised that a thorough search of their records failed to disclose the former [REDACTED] ever having been employed at that establishment.
---
② - Seattle (Enc. 2) Recorded 2 - Sacramento (164-50)(Enc. 2) 1 - Las Vegas
HEH:bsh (5)
---
164-81-2174 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED FEB 7 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
Approved: ____________ Special Agent in Charge
Sent _________ M Per _________
DB Cooper-6371
LV 164-60
---
She noted, however, that their records did disclose one, [REDACTED] with Social Security Number [REDACTED] and residence [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Nevada, was employed as a [REDACTED] at the Stardust Hotel from [REDACTED] when he voluntarily resigned. She stated there was nothing additional concerning [REDACTED] in their personnel files, and noted that employment records for that period were maintained by a security firm known as [REDACTED] which is no longer in operation.
---
[REDACTED] Clark County SO, advised on 2/1/72, that they had no record of [REDACTED] and that any [REDACTED] would require a work permit from the Clark County SO.
---
Their records disclosed # [REDACTED] which indicated that [REDACTED] a W/M adult, born [REDACTED] at [REDACTED] 6'1" tall, 183 pounds, medium build, black hair, blue-gray eyes, dark complexion, with [REDACTED] and residence at [REDACTED] Nevada, subject [REDACTED] who had been an Air Force veteran with honorable discharge as a private first class serial # [REDACTED] held a work permit for employment as a [REDACTED] Nevada.
---
According to their records [REDACTED] was initially employed with the Tropicana Hotel as of [REDACTED] the Riviera Hotel [REDACTED] the Dunes Hotel on [REDACTED] the Silver Slipper on [REDACTED] and the Stardust Hotel from [REDACTED] when his card was cancelled due to his resignation from the Stardust.
---
[REDACTED] file indicated a prior arrest by the [REDACTED] and at the time of his work card application on 1/15/62, for the Stardust Hotel he listed the following references:
[REDACTED]
---
2
DB Cooper-6372
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] Las Vegas PD, advised on 2/1/72, their file [REDACTED] disclosed that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] born [REDACTED] with residence at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Nevada, had made application for [REDACTED] position with the Las Vegas PD on 4/22/51, received a work card [REDACTED] the Mint Hotel on 2/20/59, and was [REDACTED] 9/18/61, [REDACTED]
---
The record disclosed that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] of 2/14/62.
---
LEADS:
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
At South Lake Tahoe, California:
Display enclosed photographs to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to determine if [REDACTED] [REDACTED] is identical to the [REDACTED] he described .as [REDACTED] at the Stardust in Las Vegas in 1963.
---
2. If identical Sacramento will then contact DMV, obtain most recent photograph of [REDACTED] and have same forwarded to Seattle and related offices for display to pertinent witness in this matter for identification or elimination as subject.
---
CONSIDER UNSUB DANGEROUS.
---
3
---
DB Cooper-6373
Serials: LV 164-60, SC 164-50, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2174
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.