SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect reported by protected source

Document date 26 January 1972

Part 105page 51 pageDB Cooper-47453

Part of: SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re source information on possible NORJAK suspect with flying experience · 26 January 1972 · Part 20 pp. 187–188

Open in FBI Vault (Part 105, page 5 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-105:005-005

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-105:005-005

Document: Memo SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect reported by protected source
Id: Cooper-Part-105:005-005
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A005-005

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 105 p. 5 (DB Cooper-47453), Memo, dated 26 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A005-005

SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) 1/26/72

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

NORJAK

---

On January 5, 1972, [REDACTED] (PROTECT IDENTITY) advised SA [REDACTED] that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] may possibly be considered as a suspect in captioned matter because he is [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] also said [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

---

On January 18, 1972, [REDACTED] Washington, [REDACTED] there during the appropriate season, informed SA [REDACTED] that [REDACTED] has worked for them [REDACTED] in Oregon and Washington, but he lives at [REDACTED] Medford, Oregon, and he has not been in the [REDACTED] area for several months.

---

[REDACTED] said she and [REDACTED] last saw [REDACTED] during the last Christmas Holidays when they visited [REDACTED] in Oregon. At that time, she said, they kidded him about being a good suspect in the instant hijacking; however, they did not at any time actually think he is a person who would do such a thing. She studied the composite sketch of the sub- ject and said although there are some similarities, she does not actually think the sketch is a good likeness of [REDACTED] She said [REDACTED] enjoys an excellent reputation, and their exper- ience with him has indicated him to be honest and trustworthy, but she admitted that with his flying and parachuting background he would have been about as capable of performing the instant hijacking as anyone she has heard of. She said [REDACTED] [REDACTED] the Medford area, and the subject [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

---

2 - Portland 3 - Seattle WLP/sem (5)

DB COOPER-47453 164 - 81 - [guess: 4055]

Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.