SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re protected-identity source information of 1/3/72

Document date 26 January 1972

Part 20page 1891 pageDB Cooper-6146

Part of: SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re source information on possible NORJAK suspect with flying experience · 26 January 1972 · Part 20 pp. 187–188

Open in FBI Vault (Part 20, page 189 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-20:189-189

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-20:189-189

Document: Memo SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re protected-identity source information of 1/3/72
Id: Cooper-Part-20:189-189
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A189-189

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 20 p. 189 (DB Cooper-6146), Memo, dated 26 Jan 1972, serial SE 164-81-2055 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-20%3A189-189

SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) 1/26/72

SAC, SEATTLE (164-31)

NORJAK

---

On January 3, 1972, [REDACTED] Washington, b6 (PROTECT IDENTITY) advised SA[REDACTED] that [REDACTED] b7C b7D matter because he is [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] also said [REDACTED] b6 [REDACTED] b7C b7D

---

On January 18, 1972, [REDACTED] b6 Washington, who with [REDACTED] b7C and [REDACTED] there during the appropriate season, informed SA[REDACTED] that [REDACTED] has worked for them [REDACTED] in Oregon and Washington, but he lives at [REDACTED] Oregon, and he has not been in the [REDACTED] area for several months.

---

[REDACTED] said she and [REDACTED] last saw [REDACTED] b6 during the last Christmas Holidays when they visited b7C [REDACTED] in Oregon. At that time, she said, they kidded him about being a good suspect in the instant hijacking; however, they did not at any time actually think he is a person who would do such a thing. She studied the composite sketch of the sub- ject and said although there are some similarities, she does not actually think the sketch is a good likeness of [REDACTED] She said [REDACTED] enjoys an excellent reputation, and their exper- ience with him has indicated him to be honest and trustworthy, but she admitted that with his flying and parachuting background he would have been about as capable of performing the instant hijacking as anyone she has heard of. She said [REDACTED] [REDACTED] area, and the subject [REDACTED]

---

2 - Portland 3 - Seattle WLP/sem (5)

DB Cooper-6146 164-81-2055

Serials: 164-31, PD 164-41, SE 164-81-2055

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.