To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to witness at Renton, Washington
This copy: Part 105 p. 220Also filed at Part 100 p. 355 (primary) · Part 103 p. 226 · Part 103 p. 342 · Part 115 p. 141 · Part 116 p. 334 · Part 117 p. 47
This copy’s own title
To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to Renton witness (Watson, Gallaher, Shinn)
Document date 19 December 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 100 p. 355.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-105:220-220
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-105:220-220 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to Renton witness (Watson, Gallaher, Shinn) Id: Cooper-Part-105:220-220 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A220-220 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 105 p. 220 (DB Cooper-47778), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A220-220
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH
---
On 11/12/73, witness [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Renton, Washington was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 87 [REDACTED]GARY B. GALLAHER [REDACTED] RICHARD DOUGLAS SHINN 572 [REDACTED]
With the exception of [REDACTED] stated none of the other individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in his opinion, are not identical with him.
[REDACTED] stated the photos of [REDACTED] represented an individual that to him [REDACTED] were the closest he has seen to his recollection of unsub. [REDACTED] however, stated that the photos indicated that [REDACTED] had a face that was wider than unsubs and [REDACTED] hair was thinner than unsubs hair. [REDACTED] stated that based on the photographs he could not say that [REDACTED] was identical with unsub, however, he could not say that he was not identical.
---
[Signature: E. [illegible]]
RNN/jms (10) 164-81- [REDACTED]
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB COOPER-47778
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.