To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Harms Spreckel of Color Control, Inc.
Document date 19 December 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-105:221-221
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-105:221-221 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Harms Spreckel of Color Control, Inc. Id: Cooper-Part-105:221-221 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A221-221 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 105 p. 221 (DB Cooper-47779), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A221-221
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 1-11.8 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH
---
On 11/12/73, witness CORD HARMS [guess: ZUH] SPRECKEL, color control, Inc., 624 Yale Avenue North, telephone number 623-2984, was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 87 b6 b7C GARY B. GALLAHER [REDACTED] RICHARD DOUGLAS SHINN 572 [REDACTED]
With the exception of [REDACTED] SPRECKEL stated none of the individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in his opinion, are not identical with him. SPRECKEL advised concerning the photographs of [REDACTED] that even though the individual depicted was not identical with unsub, the individual pictured had characteristics which were similar to unsub; such as, hair, which appeared to be similar and hair line was close to that of unsubs. SPRECKEL adv sed that [REDACTED] forehead was similar. SPRECKEL stated [REDACTED] had shoulders that were narrower than unsubs, however.
In regard to the suspect [REDACTED] SPRECKEL made the following comments:
Side view "no it's not him"; front view "is possibly him"; "neck looks too big, nose too long, chin looks O.K." SPRECKEL stated that based on the photograph he could not say that [REDACTED] was not identical with unsub.
---
RNN/jms (10)
/[guess: 164]-81-[illegible]
DB COOPER-47779
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.
- To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Harms Zum Spreckel, Color Control Inc.
- Re photo display to witness Spreckel at Color Control Inc.
- SA to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Harms zum Spreckel
- To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Spreckel, Color Control Inc.
- SA to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Harms Zum Spreckel