To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Spreckel, Color Control Inc.
Document date 19 December 1973
Also filed at: Part 103 p. 227 · Part 103 p. 343 · Part 115 p. 142 · Part 116 p. 335 · Part 117 p. 48
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-100:354-354
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-100:354-354 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Spreckel, Color Control Inc. Id: Cooper-Part-100:354-354 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-100%3A354-354 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 100 p. 354 (DB Cooper-45313), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-100%3A354-354
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73
FROM : SA [REDACTED] b6 b7C [handwritten: Sub 87]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH
---
On 11/12/73, witness CORD HARMS [guess: ZUM] SPRECKEL, color control, Inc., 624 Yale Avenue North, telephone number 623-2984, was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 877[redacted] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] GARY B. GALLAHER [REDACTED] RICHARD DOUGLAS SHINN 572 [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
With the exception of [REDACTED], SPRECKEL stated none of the individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in b6 his opinion, are not identical with him. SPRECKEL advised b7C concerning the photographs of [REDACTED], that even though the individual depicted was not identical with unsub, the individual pictured had characteristics which were similiar to unsub; such as, hair, which appeared to be similiar and hair line was close to that of unsubs. SPRECKEL advised that [REDACTED] forehead was similiar. SPRECKEL stated [REDACTED] had shoulders that were narrower than unsubs, however.
In regard to the suspect [REDACTED], SPRECKEL made the following comments: b6 b7C Side view "no it's not him"; front view "is possibly him"; [REDACTED] SPRECKEL stated that based on the photograph he could not say that [REDACTED] was not identical with unsub.
---
RNN/jms (10)
[handwritten: Sub 87] 164-81-[strikethrough/redacted]
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB COOPER-45313
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.