To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Spreckel, Color Control Inc.

This copy: Part 116 p. 335Also filed at Part 100 p. 354 (primary) · Part 103 p. 227 · Part 103 p. 343 · Part 115 p. 142 · Part 117 p. 48

This copy’s own title

To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness Spreckel

Document date 19 December 1973

Part 116page 3351 pageDB Cooper-53393

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 100 p. 354.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 116, page 335 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-116:335-335

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-116:335-335

Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness Spreckel
Id: Cooper-Part-116:335-335
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-116%3A335-335

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 116 p. 335 (DB Cooper-53393), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-116%3A335-335

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73

FROM : SA [REDACTED]

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE

RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH

---

On 11/12/73, witness CORD HARMS [guess: &] UM SPRECKEL, color control, Inc., 624 Yale Avenue North, telephone number 623-2984, was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:

NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 87' [REDACTED] GARY B. GALLAHER [REDACTED] RICHARD DOUGLAS SHINN 572 ARVIDIS JULIUS KIPERTS 676

With the exception of KIPERTS, SPRECKEL stated none of the individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in his opinion, are not identical with him. SPRECKEL advised concerning the photographs of [REDACTED] that even though the individual depicted was not identical with unsub, the individual pictured had characteristics which were similiar to unsub; such as, hair, which appeared to be similiar and hair line was close to that of unsubs. [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] forehead was similiar. [REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] had shoulders that were narrower than unsubs, however.

In regard to the suspect KIPERTS, SPRECKEL made the following comments:

Side view "no it's not him"; front view "is possibly him"; "neck looks too big, nose too long, chin looks O.K." SPRECKEL stated that based on the photograph he could not say that KIPERTS was not identical with unsub.

---

RNN/jms (10)

DB COOPER-53393

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

Serials: SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.