To SAC Seattle re photographs shown to Cord Spreckel, Color Control Inc.
This copy: Part 115 p. 142Also filed at Part 100 p. 354 (primary) · Part 103 p. 227 · Part 103 p. 343 · Part 116 p. 335 · Part 117 p. 48
This copy’s own title
Re photo display to witness Spreckel at Color Control Inc.
Document date 19 December 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 100 p. 354.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-115:142-142
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-115:142-142 Document: Memo re photo display to witness Spreckel at Color Control Inc. Id: Cooper-Part-115:142-142 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-115%3A142-142 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 115 p. 142 (DB Cooper-52618), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-115%3A142-142
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH
---
On 11/12/73, witness CORD HARMS [guess: BUM] SPRECKEL, color control, Inc., 624 Yale Avenue North, telephone number 623-2984, was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 87 [REDACTED] GARY B. GALLAHER [REDACTED] RICHARD DOUGLAS SHINN 572 [REDACTED]
With the exception of [REDACTED], SPRECKEL stated none of the individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in his opinion, are not identical with him. SPRECKEL advised concerning the photographs of [REDACTED], that even though the individual depicted was not identical with unsub, the individual pictured had characteristics which were similiar to unsub; such as, hair, which appeared to be similiar and hair line was close to that of unsubs. SPRECKEL advised that [REDACTED] forehead was similiar. SPRECKEL stated [REDACTED] had shoulders that were narrower than unsubs, however.
In regard to the suspect [REDACTED] SPRECKEL made the following comments:
Side view "no it's not him"; front view "is possibly him"; "neck looks too big, nose too long, chin looks O.K." SPRECKEL stated that based on the photograph he could not say that [REDACTED] was not identical with unsub.
---
Sub 572
RNN/jms (10) 16 41-81 [guess: 6009]
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB COOPER-52618
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.