SA to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses, 11/12/73
This copy: Part 76 p. 132Also filed at Part 33 p. 130 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SA to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness (Watson sub-file 87)
Document date 19 December 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 33 p. 130.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-76:132-132
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-76:132-132 Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness (Watson sub-file 87) Id: Cooper-Part-76:132-132 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A132-132 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 76 p. 132 (DB Cooper-33162), Memo, dated 19 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-76%3A132-132
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) DATE: 12/19/73
FROM : SA [REDACTED] [signature: redacted] b6 b7C
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTO- GRAPHS TO WITNESSES SUB: HH
---
On 11/12/73, witness [REDACTED] telephone number [REDACTED] was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE # EUGENE LEROY WATSON 87' [REDACTED] b6 b7C
With the exception of [REDACTED] stated none of the individuals bear any resemblance to the hijacker and in his opinion, are not identical with him. [REDACTED] advised concerning the photographs of [REDACTED] that even though the individual depicted was not identical with unsub, the individual pictured had characteristics which were similiar to unsub; such as, hair, which appeared to be similiar and hair line was close to that of unsubs. [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] forehead was similiar. [REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] had shoulders that were narrower than unsubs, however.
In regard to the suspect [REDACTED] made the following comments: b6 b7C
Side view [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] stated that based on the photograph he could not say that [REDACTED] was not identical with unsub.
---
[signature: Sub H H] (10) 164-81-[illegible] Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-33162
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.