To file re Seattle informant report of 1:30 AM alibi call
Document date 27 January 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-105:246-246
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-105:246-246 Document: Memo to file re Seattle informant report of 1:30 AM alibi call Id: Cooper-Part-105:246-246 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A246-246 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 105 p. 246 (DB Cooper-47809), Memo, dated 27 Jan 1972, serial SE 164-81-2080 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-105%3A246-246
FILE (164-81) 1/27/72
SAC, SEATTLE
NORJAK
---
RE: [REDACTED]
On 1/25/72 [REDACTED], advised that the night before at about 1:30 AM Seattle, he had a call from [REDACTED] whom he knows as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He advised that on the Saturday afternoon [REDACTED] had offered him [REDACTED] to provide him an alibi for some time in November, 1971.
[REDACTED] is supposed to be out on [REDACTED] bail now on this charge. He was supposed to meet [REDACTED] [REDACTED] some time between 1:30 and 2:00 PM on 1/25/72; however, when [REDACTED] went there, [REDACTED] did not appear.
---
[REDACTED] described [REDACTED] as being 45-50 years of age, hair rather crew cut style with a receding hair line. [REDACTED] did not know what the charge was outstanding against [REDACTED] but in view of the timing and his ready availability of substantial funds, he considered maybe he would be a suspect in this case.
It is suggested that [REDACTED] be contacted, interviewed in detail, to see if he has any information of value in the NORJAK case.
---
JEM:eon (3)
---
164-81-2080 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] JAN 26 1972 FBI -- SEATTLE
---
DB COOPER-47809
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2080
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.