To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses, with list of subjects shown
Document date 12 September 1972
Also filed separately as sections:
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of suspect photographs to witness
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses on 9/5/72
- SA to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness, NORJAK
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness, 9/5/72
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of ten photographs to witness 9/5/72
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses (Sub 381)
- Re demonstration of photographs to witness, 9/5/72 (eleven individuals)
- Re demonstration of photographs to witness, 9/5/72
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness, September 5, 1972
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs of thirteen individuals to witness on 9/5/72
- Re demonstration of photographs to witness, 9/5/72
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witness, 9/5/72
- To SAC Seattle re demonstration of eleven photographs to witness, 9/5/72
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-107:050-052
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-107:050-052 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re demonstration of photographs to witnesses, with list of subjects shown Id: Cooper-Part-107:050-052 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A050-052 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 107 pp. 50–52 (DB Cooper-48694–48696), Memo, dated 12 Sep 1972, serial SE 164-81-9872 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A050-052
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)(P) DATE: 9/12/72
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
---
RE: DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTOGRAPHS TO WITNESSES
On 9/5/72, witness [REDACTED] [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED] was exhibited photographs of the following individuals:
NAME SUB FILE NO.
WILLIAM C. BEVAN 458
ALVIN BENTON CELCER 446
BILLY RAY COONRAD 456
[REDACTED]
RICHARD DRUMMOND DUKET 408
DOUGLAS ARCHIBALD WILLOWS 402
STEWART O. KIME 416
RAYMOND D. BERRYHILL 390
LONNY JAMES MC CLELLAN 435
[REDACTED]
JOHN STEVENS WHATLEY 415
[REDACTED]
LAWRENCE MILLARD CREWS 356
---
RNN:md (47)
ELIMINATN
164-81-9872 SEARCHED SERIALIZED [illegible] re SEP 12 1972 [illegible] N
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB COOPER-48694
SE 164-81
---
[REDACTED]
STANLEY ARTHUR NEWNHAM 420
[REDACTED]
ALBERT LOUIS EAGLE 350 REX ALLEN ALEXANDER 393
[REDACTED]
WENDELL WARREN WISSLER 411 RICHARD WILLIAM SCHULTZ 412
[REDACTED]
WILLIAM ALLEN JONES 360
[REDACTED]
GEORGE E. CATHEY 381
[REDACTED]
HAROLD JOHN LAWRENCE, JR. 335
[REDACTED]
JASON T. LANGSETH 327
[REDACTED]
GERALD WALDRON GUFFEY 314
---
b6 b7C
---
2
DB COOPER-48695
SE 164-81
---
[REDACTED] DAVID RAY MANN 209 [REDACTED] LESLIE GENE MINCE 174 JAMES KEOUGH 119 S. L. PETERSON 112 DOUGLAS GIBSON BURNS [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
With the exception of PETERSON, CATHEY, BURNS, and [REDACTED] stated none of the other individuals bore any resemblance to the hijacker, and in his opinion, are not identical with him. [REDACTED] stated PETERSON's lips and wide forehead remind him of the hijacker; however, PETERSON's picture shows him to be a little heavier than Unsub with not enough hair.
[REDACTED] stated that CATHEY's wide forehead reminds him of the hijacker; however, CATHEY does not appear to have enough hair and lacks the Mexican or Indian characteristics that [REDACTED] noted in the hijacker.
[REDACTED] stated BURNS' and [REDACTED] hairlines were similar to the hijacker but they lacked the Mexican characteristic also.
[REDACTED] further advised that in his opinion none of the individuals were the hijacker.
---
3
DB COOPER-48696
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-9872
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.