SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Stead AFB veteran interviewed in Reno
Document date 7 March 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-108:062-062
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-108:062-062 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Stead AFB veteran interviewed in Reno Id: Cooper-Part-108:062-062 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A062-062 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 108 p. 62, Airtel, dated 7 Mar 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A062-062
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 3/7/72
SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)(P)
NORJAK OO: Seattle
---
Re Anchorage airtel dated 2/14/72.
On 2/28/72, [REDACTED] Western Professional Leasing Company, 1225 Westfield, Reno, Nevada, advised SA ALF T. STOUSLAND that he formerly served as [REDACTED] at Stead AFB, near Reno, Nevada, 1954 - 1957. He subsequently was employed as [REDACTED] Stremmel Motor Company, Reno, Nevada. He explained that he had served as [REDACTED] while at Stead AFB but had never participated in anything involving the use of parachutes.
---
[REDACTED] advised later on that he had heard of this matter but had no information regarding the identity of person committing it. He had previously considered that the possibility existed that whoever was responsible for this hijack could have possible been a survival instructor. He recalled there were approximately 60 survival instructors at Stead AFB while he, [REDACTED] was assigned there. He felt that the only former survival instructor from Stead AFB who had the capability of committing a similar hijack was one [REDACTED] did not recall [REDACTED] complete name other than [REDACTED] nor did he know his present address or place of employment. The last he had heard of [REDACTED] he was employed in [REDACTED] [REDACTED] in Seattle, Washington. He had no particular reason to believe that [REDACTED] had been involved in this matter but based on his recollection of [REDACTED] he felt that [REDACTED] was the type of individual who could possibly commit a hijacking. He emphasized that the above conjecture was based only on a hunch and added that he had no current information regarding [REDACTED] present whereabouts or activi[ties]
---
Investigation continuing.
CONSIDER UNSUB ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
-2- Seattle 2 - Las Vegas ATS:kmc (4)
---
[stamped] SEARCHED ... INDEXED ... SERIALIZED ... FILED ... MAR 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
b6 b7C
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.