Memphis re NORJACK lead on wheelchair-bound parachutist

Document date 16 March 1972

Part 108page 1891 pageDB Cooper-49223

Open in FBI Vault (Part 108, page 189 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-108:189-189

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-108:189-189

Document: Memo Memphis re NORJACK lead on wheelchair-bound parachutist
Id: Cooper-Part-108:189-189
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A189-189

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 108 p. 189 (DB Cooper-49223), Memo, dated 16 Mar 1972, serial SE 164-81-2376 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A189-189

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC (164-81-2376) DATE: 3/16/72

FROM : [REDACTED]

SUBJECT: NORJACK Memphis Re [struck-through text] airtel to Seattle 2/19/72

---

[guess: Sect] 35[guess: 9] b6 b7C E/m

---

[REDACTED] has previously been interviewed extensively on this case and several possibilities disucssed with him. He had no suspects. It is noted that lead in this airtel is to identify a parachutist who jumps in the water because of a disabling accident and one can assume this chutist is somewhat imobile. It is believed that the hijacker in this case has full use of all of his extremities and witnesses did not tell of any physical disability. It is noted that the person they want us to identify is in a wheel chair. A man confined to a wheel chair did not hijack the plane in this case.

---

dhh

---

[signature - illegible]

---

Sub .359 164-81 [guess: 3903] SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED [guess: m] FILED [guess: m] MAR 20 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB COOPER-49223

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2376

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.