SAC Tampa to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, UNSUB aka Dan Cooper, NWA Flight 305
Document date 12 June 1974
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-117:317-317
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-117:317-317 Document: Airtel SAC Tampa to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, UNSUB aka Dan Cooper, NWA Flight 305 Id: Cooper-Part-117:317-317 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-117%3A317-317 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 117 p. 317 (DB Cooper-53817), Airtel, dated 12 Jun 1974, serial SE 164-81-6266 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-117%3A317-317
6/12/74
AIRTEL AIR MAIL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, TAMPA (164-110)(RUC)
UNSUB, aka Dan Cooper Northwest Airlines Flight #305, Portland, Oregon, to Seattle, Washington, 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION (OO:SE)
ReTPtel to the Bureau dated 1/1/72, wherein a W/M using the name WAYNE KING at Miami is mentioned; and SErep of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73.
For information of the Seattle Office, during a Tampa indices check concerning a copyright matter, the name WAYNE KING appeared in two references, one in referenced Tampa teletype to the Bureau, and the second in an [REDACTED] [REDACTED] From a review of the reference with regard to [REDACTED] it appears that the description of Subject [REDACTED] is similar to the description of UNSUB in captioned matter on Cover Page L of rerep.
For further information, all offices were advised to discontinue investigation to locate Subject [REDACTED] by Butel dated 12/12/72 inasmuch as process has been dismissed by local authorities as the Georgia authorities had withdrawn their request to locate subject.
The foregoing is submitted for whatever action is deemed appropriate by Seattle Office, noting that if it appears descriptive data of [REDACTED] is similar to that of UNSUB in captioned matter, the Seattle Office might desire to initiate investigation to have [REDACTED] located for elimination purposes.
(2)- Seattle 1 - Tampa HHN:bb (3)
164-81-6266 [handwritten] [illegible handwritten annotations]
DB COOPER-53817
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6266, TP 164-110
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.