SAC Tampa to SAC Seattle re UNSUB aka Dan Cooper
Document date 12 June 1974
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-34:270-270
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-34:270-270 Document: Airtel SAC Tampa to SAC Seattle re UNSUB aka Dan Cooper Id: Cooper-Part-34:270-270 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A270-270 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 34 p. 270 (DB Cooper-12914), Airtel, dated 12 Jun 1974, serial SE 164-81-6266 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-34%3A270-270
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI 6/12/74 Date:
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, TAMPA (164-110)(RUC)
UNSUB, aka Dan Cooper Northwest Airlines Flight #350, Portland, Oregon, to Seattle, Washington, 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION (OO:SE)
---
ReTPtel to the Bureau dated 1/1/72, wherein a W/M using the name [REDACTED] at Miami is mentioned; and SErep of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73.
---
For information of the Seattle Office, during a Tampa indices check concerning a copyright matter, the name [REDACTED] appeared in two references, one in referenced Tampa teletype to the Bureau, and the second in an [REDACTED]
---
From a review of the reference with regard to [REDACTED] it appears that the description of Subject [REDACTED] is similar to the description of UNSUB in captioned matter on Cover Page L of rerep.
---
For further information, all offices were advised to discontinue investigation to locate Subject [REDACTED] by Butel dated 12/12/72 inasmuch as process has been dismissed by local authorities as the Georgia authorities had withdrawn their re- quest to locate subject. 164-81-6266
---
The foregoing is submitted for whatever action is deemed appropriate by Seattle Office, noting that if it appears descriptive data of [REDACTED] is similar to that of UNSUB in cap- tioned matter, the Seattle Office might desire to initiate in- vestigation to have [REDACTED] located for elimination purposes. (2)- Seattle 1 - Tampa HHN:bb (3)
---
Approved: ___________ Sent _________ M Per ___ Special Agent in Charge U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574 DB Cooper-12914
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6266, TP 164-110
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.