SAC Seattle to SAC Butte forwarding Portland results, subject not believed identical to Cooper

Title revised to match the document’s own text.

Original title: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Butte forwarding Portland results, subject eliminated

Document date 18 May 1976

Part 119page 2151 pageDB Cooper-54739

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 215 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-119:215-215

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:215-215

Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Butte forwarding Portland results, subject not believed identical to Cooper
Id: Cooper-Part-119:215-215
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A215-215

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 215 (DB Cooper-54739), Airtel, dated 18 May 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A215-215

SAC, BUTTE (164-26) 5/18/76

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)

NORJAK OO: Seattle BUfile: 164-111

RE: [redacted]

Re Butte letter to Seattle, 11/20/75.

For the information of the Butte Division, the Portland Division advised by airtel dated 4/6/76 as follows:

In view of the fact that individuals close to [redacted] note his description is not in accordance with the description of D. B. COOPER and the fact that [redacted] had two readily identifiable facial scars, [redacted] is not believed to be identical to COOPER and further investigation in this matter is not warranted.

This information is being forwarded to Butte per their request to be advised of the outcome of the investigation concerning [redacted].

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

2 - Butte 3 - Seattle REI:set (5)

---

DB COOPER-54739 [handwritten, partially illegible]: 164-81-[illegible]

Serials: BT 164-26, SA 164-111, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.