SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re Edward Anthony Lane (Sub 814)

Document date 16 September 1976

Part 119page 3831 pageDB Cooper-54951

Part of: SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject interview · 16 September 1976 · Part 38 pp. 183–184

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 383 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-119:383-383

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:383-383

Document: Airtel SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re Edward Anthony Lane (Sub 814)
Id: Cooper-Part-119:383-383
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A383-383

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 383 (DB Cooper-54951), Airtel, dated 16 Sep 1976, serial SE 164-81-7405 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A383-383

FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)

FBI

Date: 9/16/76

Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via ___ AIRTEL ___ AIRMAIL ___ (Precedence)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, COLUMBIA (164-48)(RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE) BUFILE 164-2111

RE: EDWARD ANTHONY LANE SUB 814

RE: [REDACTED]

---

Re Seattle airtel to Columbia, 9/7/76.

Enclosed for Seattle is a memo of SA JON W. ARMSTRONG dated 8/11/76 containing information concerning SUB 814.

On 9/15/76, [REDACTED] Spartanburg, S.C., advised [REDACTED]. and she there- after [REDACTED] Spartanburg, S.C. [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] sometime during the latter part of November, 1971. [REDACTED] that on either a Monday or Tuesday, November 19, 1971. he got drunk and telephonically contacted [REDACTED] Upon his arrival he advised he did not see [REDACTED] but instead was met by the police who [REDACTED] and said this is how he knows the date was November 19, 1971. He further recalled [REDACTED] following weekend and [REDACTED]

---

2 - Seattle (Enc.1) 1 - Columbia AGY/nhf (3)

[handwritten, partially illegible] "Ref? [illegible]" "164-81-7405" [handwritten] "Sub-814" [handwritten]

Approved: ___________________ Sent ___________ Special Agent in Charge

[Stamp:] SEARCHED ___ INDEXED ___ SERIALIZED ___ FILED ___ SEP 20 1976 FBI - SEATTLE M Per ___

GPO : 1975 O - 590-9[illegible]

DB COOPER-54951

Serials: 164-2111, CO 164-48, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7405

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.