SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject interview (file copy)

Document date 16 September 1976

Part 38page 1851 pageDB Cooper-14856

Part of: SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject interview · 16 September 1976 · Part 38 pp. 183–184

Open in FBI Vault (Part 38, page 185 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-38:185-185

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:185-185

Document: Airtel SAC Columbia to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject interview (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-38:185-185
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A185-185

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 p. 185 (DB Cooper-14856), Airtel, dated 16 Sep 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A185-185

FBI Date: 9/16/76

Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL AIRMAIL Via ________________________ (Precedence) -----------------------------------------------------------

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: [redacted]SAC, COLUMBIA (164-48)(RUC) SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE) BUFILE 164-2111

RE: [REDACTED]

RE: [REDACTED]

---

Re Seattle airtel to Columbia, 9/7/76.

Enclosed for Seattle is a memo of SA [REDACTED] dated 8/11/76 containing information concerning [REDACTED]

On 9/15/76, [REDACTED] Spartanburg, S.C., advised [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and she there- after [REDACTED] Spartanburg, S.C. [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] sometime during the latter part of November, 1971. [REDACTED] that on either a Monday or Tuesday, November 19, 1971, he got drunk and telephonically contacted [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Upon his arrival he advised he did not see [REDACTED] but instead was met by the police who [REDACTED] and said this is how he knows the date was November 19, 1971. He further recalled [REDACTED] following weekend and [REDACTED]

---

(2) Seattle (Enc.1) 1 - Columbia AGY/nhf (3) [REDACTED initials/name]

[date stamp: partially illegible] -7/05 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ SEP 20 1976 FBI—SEATTLE Approved: _______________ Sent _________ M Per _______ Special Agent in Charge GPO: 1975 O - 590-092

---

DB Cooper-14856

Serials: 164-2111, CO 164-48, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.