Little Rock to Seattle and Los Angeles re possible charges against persons publicizing Cooper case
This copy: Part 121 pp. 65–66Also filed at Part 62 pp. 123–124 (primary) · Part 40 pp. 296–297
This copy’s own title
Little Rock to Seattle and Los Angeles re Coffelt publicity and witness recontact
Document date 5 October 1977
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 62 pp. 123–124.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-121:065-066
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-121:065-066 Document: Teletype Little Rock to Seattle and Los Angeles re Coffelt publicity and witness recontact Id: Cooper-Part-121:065-066 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-121%3A065-066 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 121 pp. 65–66 (DB Cooper-55573–55574), Teletype, dated 5 Oct 1977 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-121%3A065-066
LR0004 271225Z [illegible/partial] RR SE LA DE LR R 051700Z OCT 77 [REDACTED] FM LITTLE ROCK (164-22)(P) TO SEATTLE (164-812) ROUTINE LOS ANGELES (164-497) ROUTINE BT CLEAR NORJAK (A). OO: SEATTLE. RE JACK BRYANT COFFELT. RE LITTLE ROCK TELETYPE TO SEATTLE AND LOS ANGELES, OCTOBER 3, 1977. [REDACTED] WAS RECONTACTED EVENING, OCTOBER 3, 1977, AND ADVISED THAT THE ALLEGED [REDACTED] OF JACK BRYANT COFFELT MAY OR MAY NOT ACTUALLY [REDACTED] OF COFFELT BUT IN EITHER CASE COFFELT WAS NOT D. B. COOPER. [REDACTED] WAS ALSO ADVISED THAT THERE WAS APPARENTLY NOTHING ILLEGAL [REDACTED] ENTERING IN TO [REDACTED] OR OTHERS, HOWEVER, IF THE REAL D. B. COOPER GAINED KNOWLEDGE OF THE INVESTIGATION IN THIS CASE AND FROM THAT WAS ABLE TO FURTHER
---
[illegible cursive note] Discuss with [guess: SA] and [illegible]... [guess: legal dept]... no advise given by [guess: Legal] FBI [illegible]
---
[handwritten case number, partially illegible: 104-81-7650 or similar] SEARCHED ... INDEXED SERIALIZED ... FILED OCT 5 [illegible] [illegible] TLE DB COOPER-55573
PAGE TWO LR 164-92 CLEAR
ELUDE IDENTIFICATION AND APPREHENSION, THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY THAT CRIMINAL CHARGES COULD BE FILED AGAINST THE PERSONS ENGAGED IN THE PUBLICIZING OF THE CASE.
[REDACTED] STATED SHE RECALLS CLEARLY WHAT HAPPENED ON NIGHT OF HIJACKING, AND [REDACTED] FURNISHED BY [REDACTED] RESEMBLE COOPER IN SEVERAL RESPECTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WEIGHT. SHE DESIRES TO SEE MORE RECENT PHOTO OF COFFELT THAN ONE TAKEN AT ATLANTA IN 1948 IF SUCH IS AVAILABLE.
---
ON OCTOBER 4, 1977, [REDACTED] RECONTACTED SRA, FAYETTEVILLE, ARK., AND ADVISED [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND WOULD SEEK FBI APPROVAL BEFORE DOING SO. [REDACTED] STATED THAT [REDACTED] STATED HE WAS CONTINUING WITH "PROJECT" AND WAS GOING TO SELL HIS STORY BASED ON AN AFFIDAVIT FROM [REDACTED] CLAIMING THAT WHEN [REDACTED] [REDACTED] OF COFFELT IN DENVER, SHE IDENTIFIED [REDACTED] AS COOPER. [REDACTED] DENIES THIS, AND [REDACTED] CONTEMPLATES LEGAL ACTION AGAINST [REDACTED] IF THE ALLEGED AFFIDAVIT IS USED AS BASIS FOR STORY, PUBLICATION, AND FILM PRODUCTION. BT
---
DB COOPER-55574
Serials: 164-812, LA 164-497, LR 164-22, LR 164-92
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.