Document date 5 October 1977AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: read it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
PAGE TWO LR 164-92 CLEAR
ELUDE IDENTIFICATION AND APPREHENSION, THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY
THAT CRIMINAL CHARGES COULD BE FILED AGAINST THE PERSONS
ENGAGED IN THE PUBLICIZING OF THE CASE.
[REDACTED] STATED SHE RECALLS CLEARLY WHAT
HAPPENED ON NIGHT OF HIJACKING, AND [REDACTED] FURNISHED BY [REDACTED]
RESEMBLE COOPER IN SEVERAL RESPECTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
WEIGHT. SHE DESIRES TO SEE MORE RECENT PHOTO OF COFFELT THAN
ONE TAKEN AT ATLANTA IN 1948 IF SUCH IS AVAILABLE.
---
ON OCTOBER 4, 1977, [REDACTED] RECONTACTED SRA, FAYETTEVILLE,
ARK., AND ADVISED [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] AND WOULD SEEK FBI APPROVAL BEFORE DOING SO.
[REDACTED] STATED THAT [REDACTED] STATED HE WAS CONTINUING WITH
"PROJECT" AND WAS GOING TO SELL HIS STORY BASED ON AN AFFIDAVIT
FROM [REDACTED] CLAIMING THAT WHEN [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] OF COFFELT IN DENVER, SHE IDENTIFIED [REDACTED] AS
COOPER. [REDACTED] DENIES THIS, AND [REDACTED] CONTEMPLATES LEGAL
ACTION AGAINST [REDACTED] IF THE ALLEGED AFFIDAVIT IS USED AS BASIS
FOR STORY, PUBLICATION, AND FILM PRODUCTION.
BT