Denver to Director, New York and Seattle re attorney's client refusing interview
This copy: Part 121 pp. 191–192Also filed at Part 38 pp. 363–364 (primary)
This copy’s own title
Denver to Director, New York and Seattle re Greeley attorney's information
Document date 26 November 1976
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 38 pp. 363–364.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-121:191-192
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-121:191-192 Document: Teletype Denver to Director, New York and Seattle re Greeley attorney's information Id: Cooper-Part-121:191-192 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-121%3A191-192 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 121 pp. 191–192 (DB Cooper-55798–55799), Teletype, dated 26 Nov 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-121%3A191-192
D"O710 3312203Z [partially illegible/garbled] OO HQ NY SE DE DN O 262154Z NOV 76 FM DENVER (164-98) (P) TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) IMMEDIATE NEW YORK (164-627) IMMEDIATE SEATTLE (164-81) IMMEDIATE BT
---
CLEAR NORJAK; OO: SEATTLE.
RE DENVER TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 24, 1976; NEW YORK TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 24, 1976; AND NEW YORK TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 25, 1976.
[REDACTED], ATTORNEY AT LAW, GREELEY, COLORADO, RECONTACTED AND ADVISED HIS CLIENT REFUSES TO BE INTERVIEWED OR FURNISH ANY INFORMATION TO THE FBI UNLESS GUARANTEED $50,000.00 UPON ARREST AND CONVICTION. ADVISED HE AND CLIENT HAVE HAD SEVERE ARGUMENTS WHEN HE ADVISED CLIENT TO COOPERATE WITH THE FBI. SINCE CLIENT REFUSED, HE HAS WITHDRAWN FROM MATTER ENTIRELY AND WILL NOT ACT AS MEDIATOR IN THE FUTURE. ADVISED IT IS HIS OPINION THAT CLIENT DOES [text cut off / continues on next page]
---
[handwritten, largely illegible: possibly "164-81-" followed by illegible digits] [illegible signature/initials] NOV [illegible] 19[76?] [boxed redaction, blank/empty visible area] DB COOPER-55798
PAGE TWO DN 164-98 CLEAR NOT HAVE ANY POSITIVE INFORMATION AND IS IN RECEIPT AN ACCUMULATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND SUSPICION. HE FURTHER ADVISED [struck-through: ADVISED] IF SUBPOENAED BEFORE FEDERAL GRAND JURY, HE WOULD DECLINE REVEALING CLIENT ON THE BASIS OF LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP AND IT IS, THEREFORE, FELT SUBPOENA OF [REDACTED BOX] WOULD BE USELESS.
DENVER AT GREELEY, COLORADO, WILL ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CLIENT AND INTERVIEW.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS. BT
---
331220Z SE 1
---
DB COOPER-55799
---
b6 b7C
Serials: 164-2111, DN 164-98, NY 164-627, SE 164-81