Denver to Director, New York and Seattle re attorney's client refusing interview
Document date 26 November 1976
Also filed at: Part 121 pp. 191–192
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-38:363-364
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-38:363-364 Document: Teletype Denver to Director, New York and Seattle re attorney's client refusing interview Id: Cooper-Part-38:363-364 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A363-364 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 38 pp. 363–364 (DB Cooper-15042–15043), Teletype, dated 26 Nov 1976, serial SE 164-81-7204 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-38%3A363-364
DN071C 3312233Z OO HQ NY SE DE DN O 262154Z NOV 76 FM DENVER (164-98) (P) TO DIRECTOR (164-2111) IMMEDIATE NEW YORK (164-627) IMMEDIATE SEATTLE (164-81) IMMEDIATE BT CLEAR
---
NORJAK; OO: SEATTLE.
RE DENVER TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 24, 1976; NEW YORK TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 24, 1976; AND NEW YORK TELETYPE TO THE BUREAU, NOVEMBER 25, 1976.
[REDACTED] ATTORNEY AT LAW, GREELEY, COLORADO, RECONTACTED AND ADVISED HIS CLIENT REFUSES TO BE INTERVIEWED OR FURNISH ANY INFORMATION TO THE FBI UNLESS GUARANTEED $50,000.00 UPON ARREST AND CONVICTION. ADVISED HE AND CLIENT HAVE HAD SEVERE ARGUMENTS WHEN HE ADVISED CLIENT TO COOPERATE WITH THE FBI. SINCE CLIENT REFUSED, HE HAS WITHDRAWN FROM MATTER ENTIRELY AND WILL NOT ACT AS MEDIATOR IN THE FUTURE. ADVISED IT IS HIS OPINION THAT CLIENT DOES
---
b6 b7C
---
164-81-7204
---
DB Cooper-15042
PAGE TWO DN 164-98 CLEAR
---
NOT HAVE ANY POSITIVE INFORMATION AND IS IN RECEIPT AN ACCUMULATION OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND SUSPICION. HE FURTHER ADVISED ADVISED IF SUBPOENAED BEFORE FEDERAL GRAND JURY, HE WOULD DECLINE REVEALING CLIENT ON THE BASIS OF LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP AND IT IS, THEREFORE, FELT SUBPOENA OF [REDACTED] WOULD BE USELESS.
DENVER AT GREELEY, COLORADO, WILL ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY CLIENT AND INTERVIEW.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
BT
---
b6 b7C
---
3312293Z SE 1
---
DB Cooper-15043
Serials: 164-2111, DN 164-98, NY 164-627, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7204