SAC Miami to SAC Seattle re NORJAK candidate, photographs and identification record
Document date 29 September 1977
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-122:216-219
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-122:216-219 Document: Airtel SAC Miami to SAC Seattle re NORJAK candidate, photographs and identification record Id: Cooper-Part-122:216-219 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A216-219 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 122 pp. 216–219 (DB Cooper-56363–56366), Airtel, dated 29 Sep 1977 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A216-219
FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76) FBI TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [X] Airtel [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] E F T O [ ] CLEAR Date 9/29/77
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, MIAMI (164-552) (P) RE: NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE)
Re Seattle report of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73, Bureau airtel to Seattle, 4/11/77, Seattle airtel to Bureau, 4/26/77 and Seattle letter to WFO, dated 9/8/77.
Enclosed for Seattle are one copy each of two photographs of [REDACTED].
Enclosed for Jackson are two copies each of two photographs of [REDACTED]. Also enclosed for Jackson are two copies each of referenced Bureau airtel of 4/11/77 and Seattle airtel of 4/26/77.
Enclosed for both Seattle and Jackson is one copy of the FBI Identification Record of [REDACTED].
RE: [REDACTED]
Review of Miami files indicates that contrary to referenced Bureau airtel, [REDACTED] is not presently a fugitive out of Miami Division. Contact with Identification Division on 9/8/77, confirmed this. [REDACTED] was a subject in one and possibly both of the following two Miami files:
2 - Seattle (Enc. - 3) [handwritten, illegible] 2 - Jackson (164-32) (Enc. - 9) 2 - Miami JEB:jkj (6)
---
see 1A (630) [handwritten, circled] 16.4-?1-7678 [handwritten, partially illegible]
DB COOPER-56363 Approved: ___________ Transmitted ___________ (Number) (Time) GPO : 1977 O - 225-539
FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76) FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [ ] Airtel [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] EFTO [ ] CLEAR
Date ___________________
---
MM 164-552
[REDACTED]
Review of above reflected that [REDACTED] was tried in USDC. Miami. Fla., on 6/29/66, [REDACTED] On 8/5/66, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] This case involved lengthy appeals and on 4/1/68, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petition for Writ of Certiorari. On [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
---
The file reflected the following descriptive data:
Name: [REDACTED] Race: Caucasian Sex: Male DOB: [REDACTED] POB: [REDACTED] Height: 6' to 6'1½" Weight: 180 lbs. Build: Slender Complexion: Ruddy Hair: Brown Eyes: Brown Scars & Marks: [REDACTED] FBI#: [REDACTED] Service No.: [REDACTED] FPC: [REDACTED]
Mother: [REDACTED]
Education: Jones County Junior College Ellisville, Miss. [REDACTED]
Characteristics: Speaks Spanish fluently, heavy drinker
2.
---
Approved: ___________________ Transmitted ___________(Number) ___________(Time) Per ___________ DB COOPER-56364 GPO : 1977 O - 225-539
FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76) F B I TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [ ] Airtel [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] E F T O [ ] CLEAR
Date ___________
---
MM 164-552
[redacted]
[redacted] after receipt of telephone call at Mobile FBI Office on [redacted] (NA), Investigation & Identification Division, Ala. Dept. of Public Safety, Montgomery, Ala., advising that his department has been conducting investigation concerning [redacted] a well known Birmingham, Ala., hoodlum [redacted]. This investigation was not productive and [redacted]. No descriptive information was developed which would enable decision to be made as to whether subject was identical with [redacted].
It should be noted that the enclosed photographs of [redacted] bear a striking resemblance to the composite drawings of the NORJAK subject furnished by the Bureau.
It should further be noted that the missing person index card for [redacted] furnished via referenced Bureau airtel, dated 4/11/77, indicates that information concerning location of [redacted] should be made to Ms., [redacted].
Check of Florida Dept. of Motor Vehicle records concerning [redacted] has been made in Miami with negative results.
- LEADS -
JACKSON:
AT [redacted] MISSISSIPPI
3.
---
Approved: ___________ Transmitted __________ (Number) (Time) Per ___________
---
DB COOPER-56365 GPO : 1977 O - 225-539
FD-36 (Rev. 7-27-76) FBI TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [ ] Airtel [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] E F T O [ ] CLEAR Date ___________
---
MM 164-552
Will contact [redacted] [redacted] Miss., concerning the whereabouts of [redacted]. Additionally, Jackson should obtain a more current photograph of [redacted] and display copies (color and black and white, with and without glasses) of the artist's composite of unsub in this matter to determine [redacted] can note any similarities or dissimilarities between [redacted] and unsub. Based on information received after this interview, Jackson is to conduct the appropriate investigation to process [redacted] as a suspect if deemed appropriate. Information as to how suspects may be processed in this matter is contained in referenced report.
---
AT [redacted] MISSISSIPPI
Will conduct same lead as set out above for [redacted] [redacted] Miss.,
---
MIAMI:
AT [redacted], FLA.
Will await results of investigation by WFO prior to conducting investigation to locate subject, [redacted] [redacted] as set out in re Seattle letter to WFO, dated 9/8/77.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
4.
Approved: ___________ Transmitted ___________ (Number) (Time) Per ___________ DB COOPER-56366 GPO : 1977 O - 225-539
Serials: JN 164-32, MM 164-552, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.