SAC Miami re NORJAK suspect background, descriptive data and leads to Jackson and Miami

Document date 29 September 1977

Part 40pages 290–2934 pagesDB Cooper-16090, DB Cooper-16092, DB Cooper-16093

Open in FBI Vault (Part 40, page 290 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-40:290-293

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-40:290-293

Document: Memo SAC Miami re NORJAK suspect background, descriptive data and leads to Jackson and Miami
Id: Cooper-Part-40:290-293
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A290-293

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 40 pp. 290–293 (DB Cooper-16090, DB Cooper-16092, DB Cooper-16093), Memo, dated 29 Sep 1977 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-40%3A290-293

X

---

9/29/77

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, MIAMI (164-552) (P)

RE: NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE)

Re Seattle report of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73, Bureau airtel to Seattle, 4/11/77, Seattle airtel to Bureau, 4/26/77 and Seattle letter to WFO, dated 9/8/77.

Enclosed for Seattle are one copy each of two photographs of [REDACTED]

Enclosed for Jackson are two copies each of two photographs of [REDACTED]. Also enclosed for Jackson are two copies each of referenced Bureau airtel of 4/11/77 and Seattle airtel of 4/26/77.

Enclosed for both Seattle and Jackson is one copy of the FBI Identification Record of [REDACTED]

RE: [REDACTED]

Review of Miami files indicates that contrary to referenced Bureau airtel, [REDACTED] is not presently a fugitive out of Miami Division. Contact with Identification Division on 9/8/77, confirmed this. [REDACTED] was a subject in one and possibly both of the following two Miami files:

2 - Seattle (Enc. - 3) 2 - Jackson (164-32) (Enc. - 9) 2 - Miami JEB:jkj (6)

---

164-a - 7678

---

[guess: ace] 14 (6-0)

---

DB Cooper-16090

---

b6 b7C

Page 2 of 4Part 40 p. 291

MM 164-552

[REDACTED]

Review of above reflected that [REDACTED] was tried in USDC, Miami, Fla., on 6/29/66. [REDACTED] On 8/5/66 [REDACTED] This case involved lengthy appeals and on 4/1/68, the U.S. Supreme Court denied petition for Writ of Certiorari. On [REDACTED]

---

The file reflected the following descriptive data:

Name: [REDACTED] Race: Caucasian Sex: Male DOB: [REDACTED] POB: [REDACTED] Height: 6' to 6'1½" Weight: 180 lbs. Build: Slender Complexion: Ruddy Hair: Brown Eyes: Brown Scars & Marks: [REDACTED] FBI#: [REDACTED] Service No.: [REDACTED] FPC: [REDACTED]

Mother: [REDACTED]

Education: Jones County Junior College Ellisville, Miss. [REDACTED]

Characteristics: Speaks Spanish fluently, heavy drinker

2.

MM 164-552

---

[REDACTED] after receipt of telephone call at Mobile FBI Office on [REDACTED] (NA), Investigation & Identification Division, Ala. Dept. of Public Safety, Montgomery, Ala., advising that his department has been conducting investigation concerning [REDACTED] a well known Birmingham, Ala., hoodlum [REDACTED]. This investigation was not productive and [REDACTED] No descriptive information was developed which would enable decision to be made as to whether subject was identical with [REDACTED].

---

It should be noted that the enclosed photographs of [REDACTED] bear a striking resemblance to the composite drawings of the NORJAK subject furnished by the Bureau.

---

It should further be noted that the missing person index card for [REDACTED] furnished via referenced Bureau airtel, dated 4/11/77, indicates that information concerning location of [REDACTED] should be made to h[REDACTED] Ms., [REDACTED]

---

Check of Florida Dept. of Motor Vehicle records concerning [REDACTED] has been made in Miami with negative results.

---

- LEADS -

JACKSON:

AT [REDACTED] MISSISSIPPI

---

DB Cooper-16092

---

3.

MM 164-552

---

Will contact [REDACTED] Miss., concerning the whereabouts of [REDACTED]. Additionally, Jackson should obtain a more current photograph of [REDACTED] and display copies (color and black and white, with and without glasses) of the artist's composite of unsub in this matter to determine [REDACTED] can note any similarities or dissimilarities between [REDACTED] and unsub. Based on information received after this interview, Jackson is to conduct the appropriate investigation to process [REDACTED] as a suspect if deemed appropriate. Information as to how suspects may be processed in this matter is contained in referenced report.

AT [REDACTED] MISSISSIPPI

---

Will conduct same lead as set out above for [REDACTED] Miss.,

---

MIAMI:

AT [REDACTED] FLA.

Will await results of investigation by WFO pri or to conducting investigation to locate subject, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] as set out in re Seattle letter to WFO, dated 9/8/77.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

DB Cooper-16093

---

4.

Serials: JN 164-32, MM 164-552, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.