Office memorandum SAC Seattle to File re Air Force aerial photography of suspected landing area

Document date 14 February 1972

Part 22page 2211 pageDB Cooper-6562

Also filed at: Part 64 p. 256

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 22, page 221 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-22:221-221

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-22:221-221

Document: Office memorandum SAC Seattle to File re Air Force aerial photography of suspected landing area
Id: Cooper-Part-22:221-221
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A221-221

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 22 p. 221 (DB Cooper-6562), Memo, dated 14 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-2277 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-22%3A221-221

STANDARD FORM NO. 64

Office Memorandum • UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

TO : FILE (164-81) DATE: 2/14/72

FROM : SAC, SEATTLE Sub: E O S

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

On 2/11/72 I talked to SAC WILLIAMS in Sacramento about the Air Force photographing the area where the hijacker is supposed to have landed. He advised that they endeavored to take the pictures on 2/4/72 and again on 2/11/72 but due to cloud cover were unable to obtain the photographs. They will continue their efforts in this regard.

He advised that the photograph when developed will be about 25 ft. long and requires special equipment to read it. This is being done as a training mission at no cost to the Bureau.

---

JEM:eon (3)

---

164-81-2277 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] FEB 14 1972 FBI—SEATTLE

---

[signature: illegible] [handwritten number:] [guess: 43]

---

DB Cooper-6562

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2277

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.