SAC Seattle to file re Air Force aerial photography of suspected landing zone

This copy: Part 74 p. 128Also filed at Part 71 p. 204 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Seattle to file re Air Force aerial photography of suspected landing area

Document date 14 February 1972

Part 74page 1281 pageDB Cooper-31999

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 71 p. 204.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 74, page 128 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-74:128-128

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-74:128-128

Document: Memo SAC Seattle to file re Air Force aerial photography of suspected landing area
Id: Cooper-Part-74:128-128
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A128-128

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 74 p. 128 (DB Cooper-31999), Memo, dated 14 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-A277 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-74%3A128-128

FILE (164-81) 2/14/72

SAC, SEATTLE

NORJAK

---

On 2/11/72 I talked to SAC WILLIAMS in Sacramento about the Air Force photographing the area where the hijacker is supposed to have landed. He advised that they endeavored to take the pictures on 2/4/72 and again on 2/11/72 but due to cloud cover were unable to obtain the photographs. They will continue their efforts in this regard.

He advised that the photograph when developed will be about 25 ft. long and requires special equipment to read it. This is being done as a training mission at no cost to the Bureau.

---

JEM:eon (3)

---

Sub. S 164-81-A277 SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED AM3 FILED MN FEB 14 1972 FBI--SEATTLE

---

DB Cooper-31999

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-A277

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.