SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re employment check on NORJAK suspect in Nevada
Document date 6 March 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-23:157-159
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-23:157-159 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re employment check on NORJAK suspect in Nevada Id: Cooper-Part-23:157-159 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-23%3A157-159 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 23 pp. 157–159 (DB Cooper-7304–7306), Airtel, dated 6 Mar 1972, serial SE 164-81-2449 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-23%3A157-159
FD-36 (Rev. 3-22-64)
FBI
Date: 3/6/72
Transmit the following in _______ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIR MAIL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Minneapolis nitel dated 3/2/72.
---
Enclosed for each receiving office is one photo- graph of [REDACTED] taken in January 1971, at the Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County, Nev.
RE: [REDACTED]
Re Minneapolis nitel notes that [REDACTED] Minnesota, telephonically advised the Minneapolis Office that he recently reviewed an artist's conception of UNSUB and he felt the [REDACTED] who had name tag [REDACTED] who had been employed at the [REDACTED], Las Vegas, Nevada, resembled the UNSUB.
[REDACTED] Las Vegas, Nevada, advised on 3/3/72, that the only [REDACTED] currently employed at that establishment with the last name [REDACTED] W/M, dob - [REDACTED] 5'11", 165 lbs., brown hair, blue eyes, with SSN [REDACTED]
---
2 - Seattle (Encl. 1) [handwritten annotation] 1 - Portland (164-41)(INFO)(Encl. 1) 1 - Minneapolis (164-73)(INFO)(Encl. 1) 1 - Las Vegas HEH:kmc (5)
---
164-81 -2449 SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED /[illegible] FILED /[illegible] MAR 10 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
DB Cooper-7304
---
Approved: _______________ Special Agent in Charge
Sent _________ M Per
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] resides [REDACTED] Nevada, with a[REDACTED] and commenced employment [REDACTED] with [REDACTED] on 12/29/71.
On [REDACTED] work application card he indicated that he was employed previously from February, 1971 to October, 1971, [REDACTED] and gave no indication of any employment during November, 1971.
---
[REDACTED] Clark County SO, Las Vegas, Nev., advised on 3/3/72 that their file number [REDACTED] disclosed that [REDACTED] W/M, dob [REDACTED] 5'11". 160 lbs., brown hair, blue eyes, with [REDACTED] SSN [REDACTED] with residence at [REDACTED] Nev., applied for a work card on 2/26/71, for employment as [REDACTED].
---
[REDACTED] indicated that he was previously [REDACTED] [REDACTED] for which he was fined $25, and the file also disclosed that he was [REDACTED] [REDACTED] which case was dismissed on 2/21/68.
---
[REDACTED] indicated that he had been employed at [REDACTED] for one year previously, was in the U.S. Navy for two years earlier, and initially obtained employed as a [REDACTED] on 2/26/71, with employment [REDACTED] [REDACTED] as of 12/29/71.
---
-2-
---
DB Cooper-7305
---
b6 b7C
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] advised that photographs of subject taken at the time of his work application would be obtained and furnished to the FBI.
---
It is being left to discretion of Office of Origin as to whether photographs of [REDACTED] should be displayed to witnesses in view of substantial discrepancy in birth date with alleged age of UNSUB.
---
b6 b7C b6 b7C
---
-3*-
---
DB Cooper-7306
Serials: LV 164-60, MP 164-73, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2449
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.