SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect employment check
Document date 6 March 1972
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-94:061-063
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-94:061-063 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect employment check Id: Cooper-Part-94:061-063 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A061-063 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 94 pp. 61–63 (DB Cooper-41986–41988), Airtel, dated 6 Mar 1972, serial PD 164-41-890 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-94%3A061-063
3/6/72
---
AIRTEL AIR MAIL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
Re Minneapolis nitel dated 3/2/72.
---
Enclosed for each receiving office is one photo- graph of [REDACTED] taken in January 1971, at the Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County, Nev.
RE: [REDACTED]
Re Minneapolis nitel notes that [REDACTED], Minnesota, telephonically advised the Minneapolis Office that he recently reviewed an artist's conception of UNSUB and he felt the [REDACTED] who had name tag [REDACTED] who had been employed at the [REDACTED], Las Vegas, Nevada, resembled the UNSUB.
---
[REDACTED] Las Vegas, Nevada, advised on 3/3/72, that the only [REDACTED] currently employed at that establishment with the last name [REDACTED], W/M, dob - [REDACTED], 5'11", 165 lbs., brown hair, blue eyes, with SSN [REDACTED].
---
2 - Seattle (Encl. 1) 1 - Portland (164-41)(INFO)(Encl. 1) 1 - Minneapolis (164-73)(INFO)(Encl. 1) 1 - Las Vegas HEH:kmc (5)
---
SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ MAR 13 1972 FBI — PORTLAND
---
164-41-890
---
DB Cooper-41986
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] resides [REDACTED], Las Vegas, Nevada, with [REDACTED] and commenced employment [REDACTED] with [REDACTED] on 12/29/71.
On [REDACTED] work application card he indicated that he was employed previously from February, 1971 to October, 1971, [REDACTED] and gave no indication or any employment during November, 1971.
Lt. [REDACTED], Clark County SO, Las Vegas, Nev., advised on 3/3/72, that their file number [REDACTED] disclosed that [REDACTED] , 5'11", 160 lbs., brown hair, blue eyes, W/M, dob [REDACTED] with [REDACTED] SSN [REDACTED] with residence at [REDACTED] Las Vegas, Nev., applied for a work card on 7/26/71, for employment as [REDACTED].
[REDACTED] indicated that he was previously [REDACTED] for which he was fined $25. and the file also disclosed that he was [REDACTED] which case was dismissed on 2/21/68.
[REDACTED] indicated that he had been employed at [REDACTED] for one year previously, was in the U.S. Navy for two years earlier, and initially obtained employed as a [REDACTED] 2/26/71, with employment [REDACTED] [REDACTED] as of 12/29/71.
---
-2-
---
DB Cooper-41987
---
b6 b7C
LV 164-60
---
[REDACTED] advised that photographs of subject taken at the time of his work application would be obtained and furnished to the FBI.
It is being left to descretion of Office of Origin as to whether photographs of [REDACTED] should be displayed to witnesses in view of substantial discrepancy in birth date with alleged age of UNSUB.
---
b6 b7C
---
-3*-
---
DB Cooper-41988
Serials: LV 164-60, MP 164-73, PD 164-41, PD 164-41-890, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.