SAC Boston to SAC Alexandria re NORJAK leads
Document date 31 August 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-27:379-379
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-27:379-379 Document: Airtel SAC Boston to SAC Alexandria re NORJAK leads Id: Cooper-Part-27:379-379 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A379-379 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 27 p. 379 (DB Cooper-9460), Airtel, dated 31 Aug 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-27%3A379-379
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 8/31/72
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, ALEXANDRIA
FROM: SAC, BOSTON (164-153) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO:SEATTLE)
Re: Albany airtel to Boston 8/3/72, Butte nitel 7/27/72.
Enclosed for Alexandria are copies of referenced communications.
---
On 8/16/72, [REDACTED] Fort Devens, Mass., unable to locate any record for [REDACTED] allegedly assigned to [REDACTED] Fort Devens, Mass.
On 8/16/72, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] not known to him, and no records available to verify [REDACTED] duty at Fort Devens
---
LEADS ALEXANDRIA DIVISION AT FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA
Will attempt to determine through U.S. Army [REDACTED] prior assignment and set out appropriate leads as requested in Albany airtel 8/3/72.
---
2-Alexandria (Enc 2) 1-Butte (164-26) 1-Portland (164-41) 1-St. Louis (INFC) 1-Seattle (164-81) 1-Boston AWR:sas (7)
---
164-[illegible]-385[illegible] SEARCHED......INDEXED........ SERIALIZED...[illegible] FILED...[illegible] SEP 2 1972 FBI—SEATTLE
---
Approved: _________________ Sent _____________ M Per _________________ Special Agent in Charge U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971—413—135 DB Cooper-9460
Serials: BS 164-153, BT 164-26, PD 164-41, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.