SAC Boston to SAC Alexandria re NORJAK, no records located at Fort Devens
Document date 31 August 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-95:076-076
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-95:076-076 Document: Airtel SAC Boston to SAC Alexandria re NORJAK, no records located at Fort Devens Id: Cooper-Part-95:076-076 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-95%3A076-076 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 95 p. 76 (DB Cooper-42474), Airtel, dated 31 Aug 1972, serial PD 164-41-1123 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-95%3A076-076
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 8/31/72
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, ALEXANDRIA
FROM: SAC, BOSTON (164-153) (RUC)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO:SEATTLE)
Re: Albany airtel to Boston 8/3/72, Butte nitel 7/27/72.
Enclosed for Alexandria are copies of referenced communications.
On 8/16/72, [REDACTED], Fort Devens, Mass., unable to locate any record for [REDACTED] allegedly assigned to [REDACTED] Fort Devens, Mass.
On 8/16/72, Lt. [REDACTED] stated [REDACTED] not known to him, and no records available to verify [REDACTED] duty at Fort Devens
---
LEADS ALEXANDRIA DIVISION AT FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA
Will attempt to determine through U.S. Army [REDACTED]s prior assignment and set out appropriate leads as requested in Albany airtel 8/3/72.
2-Alexandria (Enc 2) 1-Butte (164-26) 1-Portland (164-41) 1-St. Louis (INFO) 1-Seattle (164-81) 1-Boston AWR:sas (7)
---
164-41-1123 [REDACTED] SEP 5 1972 FBI-[REDACTED]
---
Approved: ___1___________ Sent _____________ M Per _______________ Special Agent in Charge
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971-413-138
DB Cooper-42474
Serials: BS 164-153, BT 164-26, PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1123, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.