SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re suspect suggested by Oregon State Police officer

Document date 20 November 1972

Part 28page 4591 pageDB Cooper-10031

Open in FBI Vault (Part 28, page 459 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-28:459-459

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-28:459-459

Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re suspect suggested by Oregon State Police officer
Id: Cooper-Part-28:459-459
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A459-459

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 28 p. 459 (DB Cooper-10031), Airtel, dated 20 Nov 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-28%3A459-459

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 11/20/72

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)

Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority)

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle)

RE: [REDACTED]

Re Seattle letter to Portland dated 11/13/72.

For information of Seattle, an Oregon State Police Officer suggested as a suspect in this matter an unidenti- fied individual he knew to have a criminal background and to have been interested in sky diving. Investigation identi- fied the suspect as [REDACTED] who does not fit the descrip- tion of Unsub in this matter. However, [REDACTED] photograph was used in display of photographs of other suspects to Portland witnesses, who eliminated him.

No further investigation concerning [REDACTED] being conducted.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

164-81 - 4/38 [stamped] NOV 2 2 1972

---

(2) - Seattle 2 - Portland

RPH:jn (4)

---

Approved: ______ Special Agent in Charge Sent _________ M Per _________ *U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 - 455-574 DB Cooper-10031

Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.