Acting Director to SACs Seattle, Minneapolis, Honolulu and Denver re NORJAK
Document date 17 April 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-31:015-015
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-31:015-015 Document: Airtel Acting Director to SACs Seattle, Minneapolis, Honolulu and Denver re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-31:015-015 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A015-015 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 31 p. 15 (DB Cooper-11104), Airtel, dated 17 Apr 1973, serial SE 164-81-1 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-31%3A015-015
0-5 (Rev. 5-18-71)
FBI
Transmit in _________ Via Airtel (Type in plaintext or code) (Priority)
---
Date 4/17/73
To: SACs, Seattle (164-81) Minneapolis (164-73) Honolulu (164-85) Denver (164-98)
From: Acting Director, FBI (164-2111)
NORJAK OO: SE
---
ReHNairtel to the Bureau 2/20/73, and Bureau cable to Legat, Ottawa, 2/23/73. 164-81-1[guess: w]
Enclosed for each receiving office is one copy each of three photographs depicting four views of suspect as furnished [REDACTED] to Legat, Ottawa. Also enclosed is a [REDACTED] to Legat, Ottawa.
All receiving offices should note that [REDACTED] b6 and enclosures were [REDACTED] is b7C to be protected. b7D
Receiving offices should exhibit suspect's photographs to all witnesses in order to determine if identical with D. B. Cooper. No information regarding the source of these photographs should be mentioned. Results should be furnished the Bureau and Seattle as office of origin.
---
Encs. (4) [illegible handwritten notation]
---
(Do not type below this line.)
[handwritten] [illegible] 5.1 - 4625
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] APR 10 1973
DB Cooper-11104
---
(413)
Serials: 164-2111, DN 164-98, HN 164-85, MP 164-73, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.