Acting Director to SACs Seattle, Minneapolis, Honolulu, Denver and Legat Ottawa re NORJAK

Document date 17 April 1973

Part 75page 1621 pageDB Cooper-32339

Open in FBI Vault (Part 75, page 162 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-75:162-162

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-75:162-162

Document: Airtel Acting Director to SACs Seattle, Minneapolis, Honolulu, Denver and Legat Ottawa re NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-75:162-162
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-75%3A162-162

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 75 p. 162 (DB Cooper-32339), Airtel, dated 17 Apr 1973, serial SE 164-81-4625 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-75%3A162-162

Airtel

---

4/17/73 To: SACs, Seattle (164-81) [REDACTED] b6 Minneapolis (164-73) b7C Honolulu (164-85) Denver (164-98) Sub 2 Sub H H From: Acting Director, FBI (164-2111)

NORJAK OO: SE

ReHNairtel to the Bureau 2/20/73, and Bureau cable to Legat, Ottawa, 2/23/73. 164-81-10[REDACTED](4/13)

Enclosed for each receiving office is one copy each of three photographs depicting four views of suspect as furnished [REDACTED] to Legat, Ottawa. b7D Also enclosed is a[REDACTED] to Legat, Ottawa.

All receiving offices should note that[REDACTED] b6 and enclosures were[REDACTED] is b7C to be protected. b7D

Receiving offices should exhibit suspect's photographs to all witnesses in order to determine if identical with D. B. Cooper. No information regarding the source of these photographs should be mentioned. Results should be furnished the Bureau and Seattle as office of origin.

Encs. (4)

---

Sub 2 164-81-4625 SEARCHED [REDACTED] b6 SERIALIZED b7C APR 1 [illegible] E-[illegible]

---

DB Cooper-32339

Serials: 164-2111, DN 164-98, HN 164-85, MP 164-73, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4625

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.