SA to SAC Seattle re interview of subject at Auburn, Washington (duplicate copy)
Document date 12 July 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-32:067-067
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-32:067-067 Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re interview of subject at Auburn, Washington (duplicate copy) Id: Cooper-Part-32:067-067 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A067-067 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 32 p. 67 (DB Cooper-11665), Memo, dated 12 Jul 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-32%3A067-067
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) 7/12/73
SA [REDACTED] b6 b7C NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: UNSUB: [REDACTED] b6 SOURCE: [REDACTED] b7C
Pe memo of SA [REDACTED] 6/11/73. b6 b7C
---
[REDACTED] (NMI) [REDACTED] Auburn, Washington, was located and interviewed at his residence on 7/6/73. At that time [REDACTED] advised that he has no information whatsoever relative to the possible identity of the unknown subject. He stated that he does not know anyone whose initials are [REDACTED] he does not know anyone named [REDACTED] and was in general unable to furnish any information at all relative to this investigation.
[REDACTED] was asked whether he had ever discussed possible solutions to instant case. He stated that he read about instant hijacking in newspaper and knows absolutely nothing whatsoever about it except what has been published in the daily newspapers. He said, however, that he guessed he has discussed the possible solutions just like anyone else, but that any discussion he ever had relative to this case for the solution of this case was merely speculation.
He said he has no recollection of having discussed this case at [REDACTED] in Auburn, Washington, on 8/3/72, but it [is] [guess: possible] [guess: or] possible that he might have done so.
He again stated, however, that if he did discuss this case at [REDACTED] or any [REDACTED] he was merely talking and speculating and doing so without any facts whatsoever.
---
3 - Seattle RBC/rse (3)
DB Cooper-11665
164-81 VF 35
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.