SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re Wallace, N.C. tip on NORJAK composite
Document date 17 December 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-33:140-141
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-33:140-141 Document: Airtel SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re Wallace, N.C. tip on NORJAK composite Id: Cooper-Part-33:140-141 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A140-141 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 33 pp. 140–141 (DB Cooper-1224, DB Cooper-12242), Airtel, dated 17 Dec 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-33%3A140-141
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI Date: 12/17/73
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL Via _______________ (Priority) -----------------------------------------------------
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, CHARLOTTE (164-101) (P) NORJAK (OO: SEATTLE)
---
Re Charlotte airtel to Director, FBI, dated 11/9/73.
Enclosed for Seattle are two (2) copies of investigative insert.
Information obtained by the Charlotte Office concerning possible likeness between [REDACTED] and artist's sketch of the unknown subject was furnished by [REDACTED] Wallace, N. C. [REDACTED] She stated [REDACTED] at Wallace, N. C. She stated [REDACTED] in Duplin County, N. C., Superior Court, Kenansville, N. C., [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] She requested that any information furnished by her in this matter be treated on a confidential basis.
---
For the information of Seattle Division, [REDACTED] was tried in USDC, EDNC, Wilmington, N. C. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] Warsaw, N. C. [REDACTED] displayed to SA [REDACTED]
---
(2) - Seattle (Encs. 2) 2 - Charlotte IRC/bbp (4)
Approved: _______________ Special Agent in Charge
SEARCHED __X__ INDEXED ___ SERIALIZED ___ FILED __X__ DEC 21 1973 FBI - SEATTLE
Sent _______________
U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 - 455-574
[REDACTED] DB Cooper-1224 [REDACTED]
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI Date:
Transmit the following in ________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via ________ (Priority)
---
CE 164-101
a recent photograph [REDACTED] which in his opinion does not resemble the artist's sketch of the unknown subject. Agent [REDACTED] is also familiar with the [REDACTED] in USDC, EDNC, Wilmington, N. C., and his recollection [REDACTED] at that time does not fit the artist's conception of the unknown subject.
Charlotte is not setting forth leads to further verify [REDACTED] presence in Connecticut on 11/24/71 inasmuch as the above investigation plus the investigating Agent's personal recollection of [REDACTED] appears sufficient to effectively eliminate him as a suspect in this investigation.
---
Approved: ________ Sent ________ M Per ________ Special Agent in Charge U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
---
DB Cooper-12242
---
b6 b7C
Serials: CE 164-101, SE 164-81