Airtel · SAC Charlotte to SAC Seattle re Wallace, N.C. tip on NORJAK composite · 17 December 1973 · page 2 of 2AIType, title and date: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
Document date 17 December 1973AIDates: machine-written — generated by an AI model from the transcripts, and it can be wrong. The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
The scan is the source; the transcript is machine-generated from it.
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date:
Transmit the following in ________
(Type in plaintext or code)
Via ________
(Priority)
---
CE 164-101
a recent photograph [REDACTED] which in his opinion does not
resemble the artist's sketch of the unknown subject. Agent
[REDACTED] is also familiar with the [REDACTED]
in USDC, EDNC, Wilmington, N. C., and his recollection
[REDACTED] at that time does not fit the artist's conception
of the unknown subject.
Charlotte is not setting forth leads to further
verify [REDACTED] presence in Connecticut on 11/24/71 inasmuch
as the above investigation plus the investigating Agent's
personal recollection of [REDACTED] appears sufficient to
effectively eliminate him as a suspect in this investigation.
---
Approved: ________ Sent ________ M Per ________
Special Agent in Charge U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574