SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing Washakie County insert

Document date 25 March 1975

Part 35pages 19–213 pagesDB Cooper-13404–13406

Open in FBI Vault (Part 35, page 19 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-35:019-021

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-35:019-021

Document: Airtel SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing Washakie County insert
Id: Cooper-Part-35:019-021
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A019-021

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 35 pp. 19–21 (DB Cooper-13404–13406), Airtel, dated 25 Mar 1975, serial SE 164-81-6507 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-35%3A019-021

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

FBI

Date: 3/25/75

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL, REGISTERED (Priority) ---------------------------------------------

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, DENVER (164-98)(P)

SUBJECT: NORJAK

---

Re Denver airtel to Seattle, 2/10/75. [handwritten: 164-81-1w (498)]

Enclosed for Seattle for investigative assistance is one copy of [REDACTED - b6, b7C] taken during the year [REDACTED - b7C, b7D]

The following investigation was conducted by SA [REDACTED] at Worland, Wyoming:

On 2/24/75, Sheriff JAMES WARILLA, Washakie County Sheriff's Office, advised he was personally familiar with [REDACTED - b6] [REDACTED] inasmuch as [REDACTED - b7C] resided in the area of Tensleep, Wyoming, from approximately 1970 until the first of 1975. He further advised [REDACTED] did not have a criminal record; however, he was the type of person who would commit questionable acts. He advised [REDACTED] on occasion.

Sheriff WARILLA stated he could never find anyone who would [REDACTED] He further advised the person knowing most about [REDACTED] would probably be one [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Worland, Wyoming.

Sheriff WARILLA advised [REDACTED] was previously [REDACTED - b6, b7C]

[REDACTED] Sheriff WARILLA further stated that to the best of his knowledge [REDACTED] was gone on several

---

2 - Seattle (Enc. 1)(AM, RM) 1 - Portland (164-41)(Info)(AM, RM) 3 - Denver CMW:vlr (6)

[handwritten case number: 164-81 - 6507]

[stamp: SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED ____ FILED ____ [date partially illegible: 9 [illegible]] FBI — SEATTLE]

Approved: ___RLM___ Sent ______M / Per______ Special Agent in Charge

GPO: 1970 O - 402-735 DB Cooper-13404

DN 164-98

---

occasions during the latter part of 1970; however, he could not recall any of the specifics due to the lapse of time.

On 3/13/75, [REDACTED] supra (PROTECT), made available [REDACTED] on an unrecalled date [REDACTED] advised he would make available [REDACTED] and furnish any information available to him if his identity would be protected. [REDACTED] reiterated what Sheriff WARILLA had stated regarding [REDACTED] In addition, he advised it would not be beneficial to interview [REDACTED] due to [REDACTED]

---

On 3/13/75, [REDACTED] advised [REDACTED] at Tensleep, Wyoming, during the latter part of 1974 and moved to British Columbia, Canada. She advised her [REDACTED] having been discharged from the service [REDACTED] She further stated she could not recall his present address; however, she had given it [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Riverton, Wyoming. [REDACTED] advised she could not furnish any information regarding [REDACTED] since neither she [REDACTED] She concluded by stating she had received one letter from [REDACTED] in which he advised [REDACTED] in Canada. He additionally commented [REDACTED]

---

At Riverton, Wyoming:

On 3/17/75, [REDACTED] supra, reluctantly advised that [REDACTED] was presently residing [REDACTED] in British Columbia, Canada, and had a mailing address [REDACTED] British Columbia. No further questions were asked [REDACTED] due to her reluctancy to answer same.

---

ADMINISTRATIVE:

Receiving offices should bear in mind not to display the enclosed photograph to persons being familiar with [REDACTED] or the [REDACTED] inasmuch as it might compromise [REDACTED]

---

DB Cooper-13405

---

- 2 -

DN 164-98

---

Any leads regarding the Legat at Ottawa are being left to the discretion of the office of origin due to Denver not being familiar with the full extent of the investigation.

---

LEADS:

THE DENVER DIVISION:

AT CHEYENNE, WYOMING and DENVER, COLORADO: Investi- gation continues.

---

- 3 -

---

DB Cooper-13406

Serials: DN 164-98, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6507