SAC San Francisco to SAC Miami re NORJAK suspect (file copy)

Document date 15 April 1980

Part 44page 961 pageDB Cooper-17901

Part of: SAC San Francisco to SAC Miami re NORJAK suspect formerly in Seattle area · 15 April 1980 · Part 44 pp. 94–95

Open in FBI Vault (Part 44, page 96 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-44:096-096

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-44:096-096

Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Miami re NORJAK suspect (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-44:096-096
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A096-096

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 44 p. 96 (DB Cooper-17901), Airtel, dated 15 Apr 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-44%3A096-096

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)

FBI

TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET [✓] Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET [x] AIRTEL [✓] Routine [✓] CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS Date 4/15/80 ---------------------------------------------------

---

TO: SAC, MIAMI (164-522)

FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220[redacted])

SUBJECT: NORJAK (A); OO: Seattle

Re: Miami airtel to San Francisco dated, 3/21/80.

The following investigation was conducted by SA [redacted]

---

AT SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

On April 1, 1980, [redacted] (protect identity) furnished photograph of [redacted] whom he had previously stated closely resembled the subject of this matter.

Enclosed for both Seattle and Miami offices are two copies each of this photograph.

[redacted] stated that he still feels strongly that the composite of the subject of this matter strongly resembles [redacted]. He stated that though [redacted] is [redacted] years old, his last recollection of him would lead him to believe that the man looked only 40 years old. He pointed out that [redacted] flew in the [redacted] during World War II having been a [redacted] in the U.S. Air Force. He also was a [redacted] at some air base in California, during the war. He stated that [redacted] is [redacted] who is married to a [redacted] and resides at [redacted] El Cajon, California, telephone [redacted]. He further advised that his latest and he feels up-to-date address for [redacted] [redacted], Miami, Florida, telephone [redacted] and that [redacted] has an address of [redacted] [redacted] Miami, Florida, telephone [redacted]

---

2- Miami (Enc.2) (2- Seattle (Enc.2) No are alert[?]) 1- San Francisco TJS/dk (5)

Approved: ________ Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)

---

SEARCHED [illegible] INDEXED [illegible] [illegible] Per [illegible] FBI/DOJ DB Cooper-17901

Serials: 164-522, SF 164-220