Officer Efficiency Report (DA AGO Form 67-2) - 1st Lt John E. List

OFFICER EFFICIENCY REPORT SECTION I 1. LAST NAME - FIRST NAME - INITIAL LIST, John E. 2. SERVICE NUMBER: 0 978 253 3. GRADE: 1st Lt 4. CONTROL BRANCH: TC 5. COMPONENT: ORC 6. UNIT, ORGANIZATION AND STATION 9206 TSU-TC, SFPE, Fort Mason, Calif 7. PERIOD OF REPORT FROM: 27 Dec 51 TO: 20 Apr 52 8. DUTY: 116 DAYS OF LEAVE: 0 OTHER: 0 9. NAME, GRADE, SERVICE NUMBER AND ORGANIZATION OR UNIT OF RATING OFFICER: JOHN D. BIRD, MAJOR TC, 0-15781[7] 9206 TSU TC, SFPE, Ft Mason, Calif. 10. NAME, GRADE, SERVICE NUMBER AND ORGANIZATION OR UNIT OF INDORSING OFFICER: CLARENCE J. LANG, Lt Col, GS, 040705, 9206 TSU TC, SFPE, Fort Mason, California. 11. REASON FOR REPORT PCS RATED OFFICER (X) CHANGE DUTY RATED OFFICER [ ] OTHER (Specify) (SEMI) ANNUAL [ ] PCS RATING OFFICER [ ] CHANGE DUTY RATING OFFICER [ ] 12. (Do not write in this space)

---

13. DUTIES ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON PRESENT JOB (Give his duty MOS 6301, assignment, and briefly describe major additional duties) Assistant Fiscal Officer, Fiscal Division, SFPE. As Assistant Chief, Cost Accounting Branch, supervises civilian personnel in compiling, analyzing, and reporting cost data of SFPE.

---

14. ENTRIES ARE BASED ON Pd 8 Dec 51 - 26 Dec 51 NR OBSERVATION OF 30-59 DUTY DAYS [ ] OBSERVATION OF 60 DUTY DAYS OR MORE [X] OFFICIAL REPORTS [ ] 15. DESCRIPTION OF OFFICER RATED AND COMMENTS (These paragraphs should cover physical, mental, moral qualities of rated officer, and any special strengths or weaknesses affecting his ability to do certain assignments not covered elsewhere in the report) A. COMMENTS OF RATING OFFICER A well mannered, reliable, sincere officer who performs his assigned duty with diligence. He is mentally alert, physically sound, cheerful and cooperative in his relations with people. Neat and clean appearing with good military bearing. His morals are above reproach.

---

CAUTION: SPECIAL HANDLING REQUIRED This material copied from records of National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri, to be used for reference only. Do not recopy or disseminate in its original form outside the Bureau.

---

B. COMMENTS OF INDORSING OFFICER [X] I DO NOT KNOW THE RATED OFFICER BUT I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE RATER'S JUDGMENT [ ] I DO NOT KNOW THE RATED OFFICER VERY WELL BUT I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE RATER'S JUDGMENT Concur. Lt List creates a good impression from the first by his appearance and bearing and strengthens that impression by his continued excellent performance of duty. His background plus his devotion to the detail of duty made him an asset to the Fiscal Office. Studious, progressive and alert, he exhibited a distinct interest in his assignment.

---

16A. RATER'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF ALL ENTRIES MADE HEREON BY ME ARE TRUE AND IMPARTIAL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AR 600-185. DATE: 21 Apr 52 SIGNATURE OF RATER: [signature] OFFICIAL RELATION TO RATED OFFICER: Chief, Fiscal Division

B. INDORSER'S CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF ALL ENTRIES MADE HEREON BY ME ARE TRUE AND IMPARTIAL AND ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AR 600-185. DATE: 28 Apr 52 SIGNATURE OF INDORSER: [signature] OFFICIAL RELATION TO RATED OFFICER: Port Comptroller

17. This report has 0 inclosures (Insert 0 if appropriate) 18. ENTERED ON WD AGO FORM 66 DATE: 28 April 1952 INITIALS OF PERSONNEL OFFICER: [initials]

DA AGO FORM 67-2 1 SEP 50 REPLACES DA AGO FORM 67-1, 1 JUL 47, WHICH BECOMES OBSOLETE EFFECTIVE 15 SEP 50.

---

DB Cooper-4642 [circled number] 63 MAY 14 1952

253

---

SECTION II ESTIMATED DESIRABILITY IN VARIOUS CAPACITIES - INDICATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH YOU WOULD DESIRE THE RATED OFFICER TO SERVE UNDER YOU IN EACH TYPE OF DUTY DESCRIBED BELOW. PLACE AN X IN THE PROPER BOX. CONSIDER EACH ITEM IN TERMS APPROPRIATE TO RATED GRADE AND BRANCH. USE THE "UNKNOWN" COLUMN ONLY IF THE NATURE OF YOUR CONTACTS WITH THE RATED OFFICER MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO MAKE AN ESTIMATE OF HIS PROBABLE USEFULNESS IN A PARTICULAR ASSIGNMENT. RATER INDORSER A. COMMAND* A UNIT B. SERVE AS A STAFF OFFICER SPECIFY: Fiscal Officer C. WORK AS A SPECIALIST, PROFESSIONAL PERSON, OR TECHNICIAN SPECIFY: D. TEACH IN A CLASSROOM SITUATION E. SERVE IN A CAPACITY INVOLVING MANY CONTACTS WITH CIVILIANS- e.g. CONTRACT NEGOTIATION, ROTC, NG, ORC, ETC. F. CARRY OUT AN ASSIGNMENT INVOLVING MOSTLY ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES G. REPRESENT YOUR VIEWPOINT IN LIAISON ACTIVITIES H. MAKE DECISIONS AND TAKE ACTION IN YOUR NAME DURING YOUR ABSENCE I. BE RESPONSIBLE IN AN EMERGENCY REQUIRING FORCEFUL LEADERSHIP J. OTHER SPECIFY:

K. COMMENT, AND/OR CLARIFY ABOVE RATINGS AS DEEMED NECESSARY; INCLUDE ANY SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS OF VALUE TO SERVICE. Officer is economy minded and demands from his subordinates full utilization of supplies and equipment and return of excesses to supply channels. Indorser: This officer has effectively supported the Port's Conservation Program and Cost Consciousness Campaign.

*For technical services, administrative services, or staff, interpret this to mean managerial responsibilities commensurate with command.

---

SECTION III A. PERFORMANCE OF DUTY - CONSIDERING ONLY OFFICERS OF HIS GRADE AND BRANCH WITH ABOUT THE SAME COM- MISSIONED SERVICE, RATE THE OFFICER ON PERFORMANCE OF his duty assignment. READ ALL DESCRIPTIONS AND PLACE A HEAVY X IN THE BOX OPPOSITE BEST DESCRIP- TION.

7. EXCELS ANY OTHER OFFICER I KNOW IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY 6. OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY FOUND IN VERY FEW OFFICERS 5. VERY FINE PERFORMANCE OF DUTY OF SUCH A NATURE THAT THIS OFFICER WOULD BE HARD TO REPLACE [X] [X] 4. PERFORMS THIS DUTY IN SUCH A COMPETENT, DEPENDABLE MANNER THAT THIS OFFICER IS AN ASSET TO THE SERVICE 3. USUALLY PERFORMS THIS DUTY COMPETENTLY 2. BARELY ADEQUATE IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY 1. INADEQUATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS DUTY

B. IN THE EVENT OF immediate mobilization, WHAT IS THE highest level of performance YOU WOULD EXPECT FROM THE RATED OFFICER? READ ALL DESCRIPTIONS AND PLACE A HEAVY X IN THE BOX OPPOSITE BEST DESCRIP- TION.

7. WOULD GIVE AN OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE AT two grade levels HIGHER 6. WOULD GIVE A COMPETENT AND DEPENDABLE PERFORMANCE AT two grade levels HIGHER 5. WOULD GIVE A FAIRLY ADEQUATE PERFORMANCE AT two grade levels HIGHER 4. WOULD GIVE AN OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE AT THE next higher GRADE [X] [X] 3. WOULD GIVE A COMPETENT AND DEPENDABLE PERFORMANCE AT THE next higher GRADE 2. WOULD GIVE A FAIRLY ADEQUATE PERFORMANCE AT THE next higher GRADE 1. WOULD GIVE AN INADEQUATE PERFORMANCE AT THE next higher GRADE

---

SECTION IV WHAT IS YOUR ESTIMATE OF THE RATED OFFICER'S OVER- ALL VALUE TO THE SERVICE? COMPARE HIM WITH OFFICERS OF THE SAME GRADE, BRANCH AND OF ABOUT THE SAME LENGTH OF COMMISSIONED SERVICE. PLACE A HEAVY X OP- POSITE THE MOST APPROPRIATE DESCRIPTION.

8. THE MOST OUTSTANDING OFFICER I KNOW 7. ONE OF THE FEW HIGHLY OUTSTANDING OFFICERS I KNOW 6. A VERY FINE OFFICER WHO IS A DISTINCT ASSET TO THE SERVICE [X] [X] 5. A COMPETENT, DEPENDABLE OFFICER OF GREAT VALUE TO THE SERVICE 4. A TYPICALLY EFFECTIVE OFFICER WHO IS A CREDIT TO THE ARMY 3. AN ACCEPTABLE OFFICER WHOSE VALUE IS LIMITED IN SOME RESPECTS 2. AN OFFICER WHO PERFORMS ACCEPTABLY IN A LIMITED RANGE OF ASSIGNMENTS, BUT WHO COULD EASILY BE REPLACED 1. AN OFFICER WHO DOES NOT HAVE THE CALIBRE THAT ONE SHOULD REASONABLY EXPECT IN AN OFFICER

---

DB Cooper-4643

---

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1960 0-[illegible]