Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Jack Scott Farmer, negative

Document date 16 September 1980

Part 45page 3051 pageDB Cooper-18517

Also filed at: Part 67 p. 35

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 45, page 305 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-45:305-305

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-45:305-305

Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Jack Scott Farmer, negative
Id: Cooper-Part-45:305-305
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A305-305

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 45 p. 305 (DB Cooper-18517), Report, dated 16 Sep 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A305-305

1-336 (Rev. 10-26-79)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537

REPORT of the LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IDENTIFICATION DIVISION

YOUR FILE NO. 164-50 (P) FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45A10

TO: SAC, Sacramento

September 16,1980

---

RE: NORJACK CAA - HIJACKING

REFERENCE: Airtel 8/11/80 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Sacramento SPECIMENS: Two copies of fingerprints of Jack Scott Farmer

The previously reported unidentified latent fingerprints in this case were compared with the submitted copies of fingerprints of Farmer, but no identification was effected.

No inked fingerprints or palm prints were located in the Identification Division files for Farmer.

Major case prints are needed for conclusive comparisons.

The specimens are enclosed.

---

Enc. (2) (2) - Seattle (164-81)

/[illegible]4-81 - [illegible]

SEARCHED.......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED...2.. FILED...... AUG 1 8 1980

b6 b7C

THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FBI/DOJ

DB Cooper-18517

Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.