Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Farmer (file copy)
Document date 16 September 1980
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-45:306-306
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-45:306-306 Document: Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC Sacramento re Farmer (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-45:306-306 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A306-306 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 45 p. 306 (DB Cooper-18518), Report, dated 16 Sep 1980 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-45%3A306-306
1-336 (Rev. 10-26-79)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537
REPORT of the LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-59 (P) FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410
TO: SAC, Sacramento
September 16, 1980
---
SUE [guess: Poly]
---
RE: NORJACK CAN - HIJACKING
REFERENCE: Airtel 8/11/80 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Sacramento SPECIMENS: Two copies of fingerprints of Jack Scott Farmer
The previously reported unidentified latent fingerprints in this case were compared with the submitted copies of fingerprints of Farmer, but no identification was effected.
No inked fingerprints or palm prints were located in the Identification Division files for Farmer.
Major case prints are needed for conclusive comparisons.
The specimens are enclosed.
---
Enc. (2) 2 - Seattle (164-81)
---
[handwritten] 162-51-[illegible] SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED _____ FILED _____ AUG 18 1980 FBI -- SEATTLE
---
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FBI/DOJ DB Cooper-18518
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.