SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle reporting results of NORJAK suspect record checks

Document date 21 March 1989

Part 49page 2171 pageDB Cooper-20356

Also filed at: Part 49 p. 218

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 49, page 217 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-49:217-217

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:217-217

Document: Airtel SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle reporting results of NORJAK suspect record checks
Id: Cooper-Part-49:217-217
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A217-217

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 217 (DB Cooper-20356), Airtel, dated 21 Mar 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A217-217

TRANSMIT VIA: ☐ Teletype ☐ Facsimile ☐ ___________

X AIRTEL

PRECEDENCE: ☐ Immediate ☐ Priority ☐ Routine

CLASSIFICATION: ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ SECRET ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLASEFTO ☐ UNCLAS Date 3/21/89

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)

FROM: SAC, SALT LAKE CITY (164A-409) (RUC) [REDACTED] b6 b7C NORJAK; (OO:SEATTLE) SUBFILE: [REDACTED]

RE Seattle airtel to Bureau and other Field Offices dated 12/9/88.

On 2/22/89, investigation at Salt Lake City FBI Office found that [REDACTED] Utah, a [REDACTED] b6 since b7C the company was incorporated on 8/20/87.

Utah Division of Motor Vehicles, Utah Driver's License Bureau, and Bureau of Criminal Information was all negative. Financial information concerning the transaction which took place in 1973 by [REDACTED] will need a subpoena or permission b6 from the individual. b7C

Contact with the Utah County Records Office regarding any county business license or purchase of a [REDACTED] in Utah b6 County for [REDACTED] was b7C negative.

Since all logical investigation has been concluded in Salt Lake City, Utah, this matter is RUC.

---

2) - Seattle 1 - SU

RLT:mjb (3)

-1*-

Approved: [signature] Transmitted ________ (Number) (Time)

---

[stamp] [SEARCHED] [SERIALIZED] [INDEXED] MAR 3 0 1989

---

DB Cooper-20356

Serials: 164-409, SE 164-81