SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle reporting results of NORJAK suspect record checks

This copy: Part 49 p. 218Also filed at Part 49 p. 217 (primary)

This copy’s own title

SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect checks (file copy)

Document date 21 March 1989

Part 49page 2181 pageDB Cooper-20357

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 49 p. 217.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 49, page 218 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-49:218-218

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-49:218-218

Document: Airtel SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect checks (file copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-49:218-218
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A218-218

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 49 p. 218 (DB Cooper-20357), Airtel, dated 21 Mar 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-49%3A218-218

TRANSMIT VIA: ☐ Teletype ☐ Facsimile ☐ ___________ X AIRTEL

PRECEDENCE: ☐ Immediate ☐ Priority ☐ Routine

CLASSIFICATION: ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ SECRET ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☒ UNCLAS Date 3/21/89

---

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)

FROM: SAC, SALT LAKE CITY (164A-409)(RUC)

NORJAK; (OO:SEATTLE) SUBFILE: [REDACTED]

RE Seattle airtel to Bureau and other Field Offices dated 12/9/88.

On 2/22/89, investigation at Salt Lake City FBI Office found that [REDACTED] Utah, a [REDACTED] since the company was incorporated on 8/20/87.

Utah Division of Motor Vehicles, Utah Driver's License Bureau, and Bureau of Criminal Information was all negative. Financial information concerning the transaction which took place in 1973 by [REDACTED] will need a subpoena or permission from the individual.

Contact with the Utah County Records Office regarding any county business license or purchase of a [REDACTED] in Utah County for [REDACTED] was negative.

Since all logical investigation has been concluded in Salt Lake City, Utah, this matter is RUC.

2 - Seattle 1 - SU

RLT:mjb (3)

-1*-

---

[partially legible] 164A-81: 8963 MAR 3 0 1989

---

DB Cooper-20357.

Serials: 164-409, SE 164-81